vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PicoCELA Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.6M vs $235.9M, roughly 1.1× Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.). Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -125.2%, a 128.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc., formerly the Howard Hughes Corporation, is a real estate development and management company based in The Woodlands, Texas. It was formed in 2010 as a spin-off from General Growth Properties (GGP). Most of its holdings are focused on several master-planned communities. It took its name from the original Howard Hughes Corporation, which had developed the planned community of Summerlin, Nevada, and later became a subsidiary of GGP.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
HHH vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $235.9M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 121.6% | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -25.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $235.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $624.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $390.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $199.3M | $252.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $935.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $317.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $-316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | 121.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.0% | -114.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | -125.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.46 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $11.2B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $493.7M | $456.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $596.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $400.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $436.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $354.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $11.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $360.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $149.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-224.9M | $-245.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $337.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $248.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $169.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-238.4M | $-256.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -119.6% | -101.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 60.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.83× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HHH
| Rental revenue | $113.5M | 48% |
| Master Planned Communities land sales | $99.6M | 42% |
| Other revenues | $11.0M | 5% |
| Builder price participation | $8.7M | 4% |
| Condominium rights and unit sales | $3.1M | 1% |
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
