vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH) and SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP (SXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($435.8M vs $235.9M, roughly 1.8× Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.). SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP runs the higher net margin — 10.1% vs 3.4%, a 6.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.4% vs 11.1%). Over the past eight quarters, SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP's revenue compounded faster (3.9% CAGR vs -13.8%).
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc., formerly the Howard Hughes Corporation, is a real estate development and management company based in The Woodlands, Texas. It was formed in 2010 as a spin-off from General Growth Properties (GGP). Most of its holdings are focused on several master-planned communities. It took its name from the original Howard Hughes Corporation, which had developed the planned community of Summerlin, Nevada, and later became a subsidiary of GGP.
Sensient Technologies is a global manufacturer and marketer of colors, flavors and fragrances based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Their products are used in many foods and beverages, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, home and personal care products, specialty printing and imaging products, computer imaging and industrial colors. Sensient reported revenue of $1,468 million in 2013. Subdivisions include the Sensient Flavors & Fragrances Group and the Sensient Color Group. Within the Flavors & Fragrances G...
HHH vs SXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $235.9M | $435.8M |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | $44.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 121.6% | 15.3% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 10.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.4% | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -25.6% | 28.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $235.9M | $435.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $624.4M | $393.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $390.2M | $412.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.9M | $414.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $199.3M | $392.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $935.0M | $376.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.1M | $392.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $317.4M | $403.5M |
| Q1 26 | $8.1M | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | $25.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.5M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.1M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $34.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.3M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.8M | $32.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.1M | $30.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.4% |
| Q1 26 | 121.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.6% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.6% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.4% | 12.3% |
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.7% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.7% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.14 | $1.04 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.20 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.02 | $0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.14 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.46 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $38.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $767.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $11.2B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | $38.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $42.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $493.7M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $596.1M | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $400.7M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $436.8M | $30.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $767.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $709.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $613.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $11.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.35× | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.85× | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HHH
| Rental revenue | $113.5M | 48% |
| Master Planned Communities land sales | $99.6M | 42% |
| Other revenues | $11.0M | 5% |
| Builder price participation | $8.7M | 4% |
| Condominium rights and unit sales | $3.1M | 1% |
SXT
Segment breakdown not available.
