vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hartford (The) (HIG) and Kimberly-Clark (KMB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kimberly-Clark is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.2B vs $4.1B, roughly 1.0× Hartford (The)). Kimberly-Clark runs the higher net margin — 16.2% vs 13.2%, a 3.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hartford (The) posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (309.0% vs 2.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimberly-Clark's revenue compounded faster (-9.0% CAGR vs -20.8%).
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc., known as The Hartford, is a U.S.-based insurance company. The Hartford is a Fortune 500 company headquartered in its namesake city of Hartford, Connecticut. It was ranked 162nd in Fortune 500 in 2024. The Hartford is a leader in property and casualty insurance, employee benefits and mutual funds. With more than 200 years of expertise, The Hartford is widely recognized for its service excellence, sustainability practices, trust and integrity. It sells produc...
Kimberly-Clark Corporation is an American multinational consumer goods and personal care corporation that produces mostly paper-based consumer products. The company manufactures sanitary paper products and surgical & medical instruments. Kimberly-Clark brand name products include Kleenex facial tissue, Kotex feminine hygiene products, Cottonelle, Scott and Andrex toilet paper, Wypall utility wipes, KimWipes scientific cleaning wipes and Huggies disposable diapers and baby wipes.
HIG vs KMB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1B | $4.2B |
| Net Profit | $536.0M | $675.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 18.1% |
| Net Margin | 13.2% | 16.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 309.0% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.0% | 17.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $4.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5B | $5.0B |
| Q1 26 | $536.0M | $675.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $499.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $446.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $995.0M | $509.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $630.0M | $567.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $447.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $767.0M | $907.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $738.0M | $544.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 15.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.6% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | 13.0% |
| Q1 26 | 13.2% | 16.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | 10.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.00 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.96 | $1.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.77 | $1.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.44 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.15 | $1.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.88 | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.56 | $2.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.44 | $1.61 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.7M | $542.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $6.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $16.8M | $1.9M |
| Total Assets | $86.3M | $17.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.7M | $542.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $688.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $617.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $634.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $563.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $6.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | $16.8M | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.4B | $840.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $86.3M | $17.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.0B | $17.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.0B | $16.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.6B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.3B | $16.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.9B | $16.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.2B | $17.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.0B | $17.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.38× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.23× | 4.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.24× | 4.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.25× | 5.09× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.26× | 5.89× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.27× | 8.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.26× | 5.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.28× | 6.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HIG
| Earned premiums | $3.6B | 88% |
| Other | $486.0M | 12% |
| Fee income | $12.0M | 0% |
KMB
| NA | $2.7B | 64% |
| IPC | $1.5B | 36% |
