vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hartford (The) (HIG) and Mohawk Industries (MHK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hartford (The) is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1B vs $2.7B, roughly 1.5× Mohawk Industries). Hartford (The) runs the higher net margin — 13.2% vs 1.6%, a 11.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Mohawk Industries posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.4% vs -43.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Mohawk Industries's revenue compounded faster (0.4% CAGR vs -20.8%).
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc., known as The Hartford, is a U.S.-based insurance company. The Hartford is a Fortune 500 company headquartered in its namesake city of Hartford, Connecticut. It was ranked 162nd in Fortune 500 in 2024. The Hartford is a leader in property and casualty insurance, employee benefits and mutual funds. With more than 200 years of expertise, The Hartford is widely recognized for its service excellence, sustainability practices, trust and integrity. It sells produc...
Mohawk Industries is an American flooring manufacturer based in Calhoun, Georgia. Mohawk produces floor covering products for residential and commercial applications in North America and residential applications in Europe. The company manufacturing portfolio consists of soft flooring products, hard flooring products, laminate flooring, sheet vinyl and luxury vinyl tile, natural stone and quartz countertops. In Europe, the company also produces and sells insulation, panels and mezzanine flooring.
HIG vs MHK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1B | $2.7B |
| Net Profit | $536.0M | $42.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 2.5% |
| Net Margin | 13.2% | 1.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -43.7% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.0% | -55.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | $536.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $995.0M | $146.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $630.0M | $72.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $93.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $767.0M | $162.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $738.0M | $157.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.96 | $0.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.77 | $1.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.44 | $2.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.15 | $1.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.88 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.56 | $2.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.44 | $2.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.7M | $856.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $16.8M | $8.4B |
| Total Assets | $86.3M | $13.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $856.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $516.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $546.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $702.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $666.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $424.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $497.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.0B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4B | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.5B | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.8B | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.4B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0B | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7B | $7.6B |
| Q1 26 | $86.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.0B | $13.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.0B | $13.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.6B | $13.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.3B | $13.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.9B | $12.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.2B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.0B | $13.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.23× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.27× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.28× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $459.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $265.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 9.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 10.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $616.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.9B | $459.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $386.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $206.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $985.0M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $397.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $319.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $233.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.8B | $265.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $310.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $126.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $947.0M | $-85.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $204.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $142.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.9% | -3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 83.8% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.5% | 5.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.70× | 3.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.56× | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.19× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.71× | 1.48× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HIG
| Earned premiums | $3.6B | 88% |
| Other | $486.0M | 12% |
| Fee income | $12.0M | 0% |
MHK
| Other | $1.1B | 41% |
| Flooring NA Segment | $869.8M | 32% |
| Other Products | $270.0M | 10% |
| Other Geographical Areas | $222.0M | 8% |
| Laminateand Wood | $204.2M | 8% |
| Carpet And Resilient | $13.3M | 0% |
| Flooring ROW Segment | $4.9M | 0% |
