vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hartford (The) (HIG) and Xylem Inc. (XYL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hartford (The) is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.9× Xylem Inc.). Hartford (The) runs the higher net margin — 13.2% vs 8.9%, a 4.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Xylem Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs -43.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Xylem Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.0% CAGR vs -20.8%).
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc., known as The Hartford, is a U.S.-based insurance company. The Hartford is a Fortune 500 company headquartered in its namesake city of Hartford, Connecticut. It was ranked 162nd in Fortune 500 in 2024. The Hartford is a leader in property and casualty insurance, employee benefits and mutual funds. With more than 200 years of expertise, The Hartford is widely recognized for its service excellence, sustainability practices, trust and integrity. It sells produc...
Xylem is one of the two types of transport tissue in vascular plants, the other being phloem; both of these are part of the vascular bundle. The basic function of the xylem is to transport water upward from the roots to parts of the plants such as stems and leaves, but it also transports nutrients. The word xylem is derived from the Ancient Greek word ξύλον (xúlon), meaning "wood"; the best-known xylem tissue is wood, though it is found throughout a plant.
HIG vs XYL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $536.0M | $189.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 11.5% |
| Net Margin | 13.2% | 8.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -43.7% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.0% | 13.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.79 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $4.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5B | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $536.0M | $189.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $995.0M | $226.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $630.0M | $169.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $767.0M | $217.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $738.0M | $194.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.2% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | 13.2% | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | 8.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.79 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.96 | $1.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.77 | $0.93 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.44 | $0.93 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.15 | $0.69 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.88 | $1.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.56 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.44 | $0.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.7M | $808.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $16.8M | $11.0B |
| Total Assets | $86.3M | $17.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.7M | $808.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $989.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $815.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | $16.8M | $11.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.0B | $11.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.5B | $11.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.8B | $10.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.4B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0B | $10.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7B | $10.3B |
| Q1 26 | $86.3M | $17.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.0B | $17.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.0B | $17.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.6B | $17.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.3B | $16.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.9B | $16.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.2B | $16.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.0B | $15.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.23× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.24× | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.25× | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.26× | 0.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.27× | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.28× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HIG
| Earned premiums | $3.6B | 88% |
| Other | $486.0M | 12% |
| Fee income | $12.0M | 0% |
XYL
| Revenue from products | $1.8B | 83% |
| Revenue from services | $368.0M | 17% |
