vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of High Tide Inc. (HITI) and NaaS Technology Inc. (NAAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
High Tide Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.5M vs $1.3M, roughly 111.0× NaaS Technology Inc.).
High Tide Inc. is a Canada-based consumer retail and lifestyle company focused on the global cannabis sector. It operates a large network of licensed cannabis dispensaries across North America, sells cannabis consumption accessories and branded cannabis products, and runs multiple leading e-commerce platforms catering to recreational and medical cannabis users.
NaaS Technology Inc. is a leading electric vehicle energy service provider based in China. It delivers one-stop solutions covering charging network operation, software and hardware support for charging station operators, and value-added services such as charging location search and payment for EV owners, serving both enterprise and individual customers across domestic and select overseas markets.
HITI vs NAAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $142.5M | $1.3M |
| Net Profit | $-2.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 96.7% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | -58.7% |
| Net Margin | -1.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | -95.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $142.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.3M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $128.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.6K | $874.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $236.2K | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $118.1M | $1.8M |
| Q1 26 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $991.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $991 | $-163.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | $166 | $-50.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.9M | $-4.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.4% | 96.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.3% | 56.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.2% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.3% | 25.3% |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | -58.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | -112.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | -144.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.3% | -193.9% |
| Q1 26 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | -18.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | -193.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.3% | -236.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.