vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE) and KAMADA LTD (KMDA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.1M vs $47.0M, roughly 2.0× KAMADA LTD). KAMADA LTD runs the higher net margin — 11.3% vs -98.1%, a 109.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (218.6% vs 12.6%). Over the past eight quarters, HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (102.2% CAGR vs 12.0%).
Mastech Digital, Inc. is a digital transformation and information technology (IT) services company headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, providing services to corporations across North America, Middle East, Asian, and Japan.
Kamada Ltd. is a global biopharmaceutical company specializing in the research, manufacturing, and commercialization of specialty pharmaceuticals derived from human plasma.
HIVE vs KMDA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $93.1M | $47.0M |
| Net Profit | $-91.3M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | -27.1% | 42.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 16.6% |
| Net Margin | -98.1% | 11.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 218.6% | 12.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -234.0% | 37.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.38 | $0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $93.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.3M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.6M | $44.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.6M | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2M | $42.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $37.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-91.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.8M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.0M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.0K | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.3M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.4M |
| Q4 25 | -27.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 42.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.6% | 42.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -43.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -66.1% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.4% | 44.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.7% |
| Q4 25 | -98.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.8% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 233.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.38 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.17 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $72.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $559.3M | $265.2M |
| Total Assets | $624.0M | $377.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $66.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $76.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.7M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $56.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $48.2M |
| Q4 25 | $559.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $624.6M | $265.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $560.5M | $260.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $252.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $430.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.5M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $268.6M | $251.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $251.2M |
| Q4 25 | $624.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $693.0M | $377.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.7M | $368.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $375.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $478.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $334.7M | $351.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $351.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $343.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $46.0M | $10.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.97× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $46.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.6M | $10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-513.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-28.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $22.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-55.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -189.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -153.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 92.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 143.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.29× | 1.09× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.42× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.94× | 5.75× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.43× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
