vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE) and UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.2M vs $93.1M, roughly 1.5× HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.). UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ runs the higher net margin — 25.2% vs -98.1%, a 123.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (218.6% vs -14.5%). Over the past eight quarters, HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (102.2% CAGR vs -5.3%).
Mastech Digital, Inc. is a digital transformation and information technology (IT) services company headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, providing services to corporations across North America, Middle East, Asian, and Japan.
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
HIVE vs OLED — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $93.1M | $142.2M |
| Net Profit | $-91.3M | $35.9M |
| Gross Margin | -27.1% | 74.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 30.1% |
| Net Margin | -98.1% | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 218.6% | -14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -234.0% | -44.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.38 | $0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $142.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $93.1M | $172.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.3M | $139.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.6M | $171.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.2M | $162.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.6M | $161.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2M | $158.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-91.3M | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.8M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.0M | $67.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.2M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.0K | $66.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.3M | $52.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -27.1% | 76.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 74.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.6% | 77.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -43.7% | 77.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -66.1% | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.4% | 75.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -98.1% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.8% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 233.2% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.7% | 33.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.38 | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $1.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.52 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $1.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.17 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $516.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $559.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $624.0M | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $516.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $602.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $603.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $571.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.5M | $492.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.7M | $551.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $530.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $559.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $624.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $560.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $430.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $268.6M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $624.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $693.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $478.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $334.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $46.0M | $108.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $108.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.0M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.6M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-28.5M | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $79.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | $67.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-55.5M | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.7M | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $57.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -189.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -153.4% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 92.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 143.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.29× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.42× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.94× | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HIVE
Segment breakdown not available.
OLED
| Material sales | $83.7M | 59% |
| Royalty and license fees | $54.2M | 38% |
| Contract research services | $4.3M | 3% |
