vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE) and Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.3M vs $93.1M, roughly 1.5× HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.). Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -31.4% vs -98.1%, a 66.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (218.6% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (102.2% CAGR vs 0.0%).
Mastech Digital, Inc. is a digital transformation and information technology (IT) services company headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, providing services to corporations across North America, Middle East, Asian, and Japan.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
HIVE vs PDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $93.1M | $143.3M |
| Net Profit | $-91.3M | $-45.0M |
| Gross Margin | -27.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | -98.1% | -31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 218.6% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -234.0% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.38 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $143.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $93.1M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.3M | $139.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.6M | $140.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.2M | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.6M | $139.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2M | $143.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-91.3M | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.8M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.0M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.2M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.0K | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.3M | $-9.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -27.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -43.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -66.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -31.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -98.1% | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.8% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 233.2% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.7% | -6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.38 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.52 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.17 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $559.3M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $624.0M | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $731.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.5M | $109.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.7M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $138.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $559.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $624.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $560.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $430.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $268.6M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $624.0M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $693.0M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.7M | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $478.6M | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $334.7M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $46.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 110.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.0M | $140.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.6M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-28.5M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | $66.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-55.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -189.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -153.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 110.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 92.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 143.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.42× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.94× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.