vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE) and VICOR CORP (VICR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VICOR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($113.0M vs $93.1M, roughly 1.2× HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.). VICOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 18.3% vs -98.1%, a 116.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (218.6% vs 20.2%). Over the past eight quarters, HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (102.2% CAGR vs 14.7%).
Mastech Digital, Inc. is a digital transformation and information technology (IT) services company headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, providing services to corporations across North America, Middle East, Asian, and Japan.
Vicor Corporation is a manufacturer of power modules headquartered in Andover, Massachusetts.
HIVE vs VICR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $93.1M | $113.0M |
| Net Profit | $-91.3M | $20.7M |
| Gross Margin | -27.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 59.7% |
| Net Margin | -98.1% | 18.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 218.6% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -234.0% | 713.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.38 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $113.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $93.1M | $107.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.3M | $110.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.6M | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.2M | $96.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.6M | $93.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.2M | $85.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-91.3M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.8M | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.0M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.2M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.0K | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.3M | $-1.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -27.1% | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 57.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.6% | 95.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -43.7% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -66.1% | 49.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.4% | 49.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 59.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -98.1% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.1% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.8% | 42.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 233.2% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.7% | -1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.38 | $1.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.52 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.17 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $404.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $559.3M | $754.1M |
| Total Assets | $624.0M | $804.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $404.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $402.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $362.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $338.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $296.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.5M | $277.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.7M | $267.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $251.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $754.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $559.3M | $711.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $624.6M | $630.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $560.5M | $608.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $580.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $430.9M | $570.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.5M | $554.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $268.6M | $537.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $804.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $624.0M | $785.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $693.0M | $710.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.7M | $693.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $665.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $478.6M | $641.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $334.7M | $632.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $613.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $46.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.0M | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.6M | $38.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $65.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-28.5M | $10.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | $15.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $59.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-55.5M | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-34.7M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 61.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -189.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -153.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 92.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 143.9% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.29× | 1.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.42× | 0.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.94× | 1.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HIVE
Segment breakdown not available.
VICR
| Product revenue | $98.0M | 87% |
| Royalty revenue | $15.0M | 13% |
