vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC. (HIW) and RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC. (RGP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($203.4M vs $117.7M, roughly 1.7× RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.). HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 14.6% vs -10.8%, a 25.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.1% vs -19.2%). Over the past eight quarters, HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.9% CAGR vs -11.8%).
Highwoods Properties, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that owns, develops, acquires, and manages high-quality office properties primarily located in fast-growing metropolitan areas across the Southeastern and Mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. Its client base includes corporate tenants across diverse industry segments such as technology, healthcare, finance, and professional services.
RGP, formerly known as Resources Global Professionals, is the operating arm of Resources Connection, Inc.. The company provides consulting services in the areas of finance & accounting, information management, governance, risk & compliance (GRC), human capital, legal & regulatory, corporate advisory & restructuring, strategic communications, and supply chain management. As of fiscal year ending May 28, 2016, the company employed 3,283 professionals in 68 offices in 20 countries around the wor...
HIW vs RGP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $203.4M | $117.7M |
| Net Profit | $29.7M | $-12.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.1% |
| Operating Margin | 67.2% | -10.3% |
| Net Margin | 14.6% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.1% | -19.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1029.4% | 81.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.25 | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $203.4M | $117.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.8M | $120.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.6M | $139.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.4M | $129.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $205.5M | $145.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $204.3M | $136.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $204.7M | $148.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $211.3M | $151.3M |
| Q4 25 | $29.7M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.7M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.2M | $-73.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.0M | $-44.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.2M | $-68.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.5M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.8M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.2M | $2.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 40.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.0% |
| Q4 25 | 67.2% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.3% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 68.3% | -47.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 67.5% | -38.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 65.2% | -52.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.8% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 68.5% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 66.7% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | -52.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.9% | -34.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.6% | -47.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | -4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.6% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.9% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.25 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $-2.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.91 | $-1.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $-2.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.14 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.59 | $0.31 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.25 | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.4M | $89.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $194.6M |
| Total Assets | $6.3B | $289.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.4M | $89.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.3M | $77.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2M | $86.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $72.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.4M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.6M | $89.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.0M | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.4M | $113.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $194.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $206.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $207.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $277.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $325.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $407.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $418.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $414.9M |
| Q4 25 | $6.3B | $289.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | $287.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $304.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | $375.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0B | $424.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0B | $512.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $510.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0B | $523.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $359.2M | $15.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $15.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 12.09× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $24.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $359.2M | $15.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.7M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.5M | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.3M | $659.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $403.6M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.5M | $-309.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $130.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $72.4M | $20.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $238.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $61.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-575.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $20.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 12.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.30× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.01× | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.66× | 8.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HIW
| Raleigh NC | $45.6M | 22% |
| Nashville TN | $38.7M | 19% |
| Atlanta GA | $36.1M | 18% |
| Charlotte NC | $26.1M | 13% |
| Tampa FL | $22.2M | 11% |
| Orlando FL | $14.4M | 7% |
| Other | $11.4M | 6% |
| Richmond VA | $8.8M | 4% |
RGP
| US | $93.7M | 80% |
| Non Us | $24.0M | 20% |
