vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HiTek Global Inc. (HKIT) and SciSparc Ltd. (SPRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HiTek Global Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($741.5K vs $461.0K, roughly 1.6× SciSparc Ltd.). HiTek Global Inc. runs the higher net margin — -123.5% vs -2041.6%, a 1918.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SciSparc Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-45.1% vs -59.6%).
DB HiTek Co., Ltd., formerly Dongbu HiTek, is a semiconductor contract manufacturing and design company headquartered in Bucheon, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea. DB HiTek is one of the major contract chip manufacturers, alongside TSMC, Samsung Electronics, GlobalFoundries, and UMC. It is also the second-largest foundry company in South Korea, behind Samsung Electronics.
SciSparc Ltd. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing novel therapies for unmet medical needs in the neurological, psychiatric, and gastrointestinal disorder segments. It operates across global biotech markets, leveraging proprietary cannabinoid-based formulation technologies to advance its pipeline of therapeutic candidates.
HKIT vs SPRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $741.5K | $461.0K |
| Net Profit | $-916.1K | $-9.4M |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 78.1% |
| Operating Margin | -181.7% | -588.5% |
| Net Margin | -123.5% | -2041.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -59.6% | -45.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -853.0% | -155.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $17.92 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $741.5K | $461.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $466.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $840.0K | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.9M | $2.0M |
| Q2 25 | $-916.1K | $-9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $121.7K | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | $622.0K | $-2.9M |
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 78.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.0% | 56.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | 50.9% | 74.2% |
| Q2 25 | -181.7% | -588.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -813.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.3% | -419.9% | ||
| Q2 23 | 17.2% | -150.5% |
| Q2 25 | -123.5% | -2041.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -813.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | -438.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | 21.1% | -148.7% |
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $17.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-8.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $35.70 | ||
| Q2 23 | $0.05 | $10.85 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $29.8M | $1.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $34.6M | $-81.0K |
| Total Assets | $41.1M | $5.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $29.8M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.4M | $252.0K | ||
| Q2 23 | $12.2M | $2.1M |
| Q2 25 | $34.6M | $-81.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.1M | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | $26.0M | $6.8M |
| Q2 25 | $41.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.5M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | $33.2M | $9.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.2M | $-1.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $754.1K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | $200.9K | $-3.2M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $744.3K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | $60.3K | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.6% | -261.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | 2.0% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | 4.8% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.20× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
