vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Hilton Worldwide (HLT) and Iron Mountain (IRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Hilton Worldwide is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.6× Iron Mountain). Hilton Worldwide runs the higher net margin — 13.0% vs 5.1%, a 8.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Iron Mountain posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.6% vs 9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Iron Mountain's revenue compounded faster (11.7% CAGR vs -0.2%).

Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. is an American multinational hospitality company that manages and franchises a broad portfolio of hotels, resorts, and timeshare properties. Founded by Conrad Hilton in May 1919, the company is now led by Christopher J. Nassetta. Hilton is headquartered in Tysons, Virginia, United States.

Iron Mountain Inc. is an American enterprise information management services company founded in 1951 and headquartered in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Its records management, information destruction, and data backup and recovery services are supplied to more than 220,000 customers in 58 countries throughout North America, Europe, Latin America, Africa, Asia, and Oceania.

HLT vs IRM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
HLT
HLT
1.6× larger
HLT
$2.9B
$1.8B
IRM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
IRM
IRM
+7.6% gap
IRM
16.6%
9.0%
HLT
Higher net margin
HLT
HLT
8.0% more per $
HLT
13.0%
5.1%
IRM
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
IRM
IRM
Annualised
IRM
11.7%
-0.2%
HLT

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
HLT
HLT
IRM
IRM
Revenue
$2.9B
$1.8B
Net Profit
$383.0M
$93.1M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
23.1%
18.5%
Net Margin
13.0%
5.1%
Revenue YoY
9.0%
16.6%
Net Profit YoY
27.7%
-11.9%
EPS (diluted)
$1.66
$0.31

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
HLT
HLT
IRM
IRM
Q1 26
$2.9B
Q4 25
$3.1B
$1.8B
Q3 25
$3.1B
$1.8B
Q2 25
$3.1B
$1.7B
Q1 25
$2.7B
$1.6B
Q4 24
$2.8B
$1.6B
Q3 24
$2.9B
$1.6B
Q2 24
$3.0B
$1.5B
Net Profit
HLT
HLT
IRM
IRM
Q1 26
$383.0M
Q4 25
$297.0M
$93.1M
Q3 25
$420.0M
$86.2M
Q2 25
$440.0M
$-43.3M
Q1 25
$300.0M
$16.2M
Q4 24
$505.0M
$105.7M
Q3 24
$344.0M
$-33.7M
Q2 24
$421.0M
$34.6M
Operating Margin
HLT
HLT
IRM
IRM
Q1 26
23.1%
Q4 25
19.5%
18.5%
Q3 25
24.9%
17.6%
Q2 25
24.8%
15.2%
Q1 25
19.9%
16.0%
Q4 24
17.6%
17.9%
Q3 24
21.7%
16.1%
Q2 24
24.6%
15.0%
Net Margin
HLT
HLT
IRM
IRM
Q1 26
13.0%
Q4 25
9.6%
5.1%
Q3 25
13.5%
4.9%
Q2 25
14.0%
-2.5%
Q1 25
11.1%
1.0%
Q4 24
18.1%
6.7%
Q3 24
12.0%
-2.2%
Q2 24
14.3%
2.3%
EPS (diluted)
HLT
HLT
IRM
IRM
Q1 26
$1.66
Q4 25
$1.27
$0.31
Q3 25
$1.78
$0.28
Q2 25
$1.84
$-0.15
Q1 25
$1.23
$0.05
Q4 24
$2.05
$0.35
Q3 24
$1.38
$-0.11
Q2 24
$1.67
$0.12

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
HLT
HLT
IRM
IRM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$158.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$12.4M
$16.2B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-981.0M
Total Assets
$21.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
HLT
HLT
IRM
IRM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$918.0M
$158.5M
Q3 25
$1.1B
Q2 25
$371.0M
Q1 25
$731.0M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$155.7M
Q3 24
$1.6B
Q2 24
$731.0M
Total Debt
HLT
HLT
IRM
IRM
Q1 26
$12.4M
Q4 25
$12.3B
$16.2B
Q3 25
$11.6B
$15.5B
Q2 25
$10.9B
$14.8B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$14.2B
Q4 24
$10.6B
$13.0B
Q3 24
$10.6B
$13.2B
Q2 24
$9.6B
$12.8B
Stockholders' Equity
HLT
HLT
IRM
IRM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-5.4B
$-981.0M
Q3 25
$-4.9B
$-882.0M
Q2 25
$-4.6B
$-767.4M
Q1 25
$-4.4B
$-698.5M
Q4 24
$-3.7B
$-503.1M
Q3 24
$-3.5B
$-259.0M
Q2 24
$-3.1B
$-132.9M
Total Assets
HLT
HLT
IRM
IRM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$16.8B
$21.1B
Q3 25
$16.6B
$20.6B
Q2 25
$15.9B
$20.2B
Q1 25
$16.0B
$19.4B
Q4 24
$16.5B
$18.7B
Q3 24
$16.7B
$18.5B
Q2 24
$15.7B
$18.0B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
HLT
HLT
IRM
IRM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$500.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-16.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-0.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.3%
28.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
5.37×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-931.6M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
HLT
HLT
IRM
IRM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$203.0M
$500.0M
Q3 25
$816.0M
$267.6M
Q2 25
$658.0M
$375.1M
Q1 25
$452.0M
$197.3M
Q4 24
$582.0M
$431.6M
Q3 24
$664.0M
$252.9M
Q2 24
$421.0M
$382.2M
Free Cash Flow
HLT
HLT
IRM
IRM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$173.0M
$-16.2M
Q3 25
$787.0M
$-256.3M
Q2 25
$635.0M
$-181.6M
Q1 25
$433.0M
$-477.5M
Q4 24
$534.0M
$-186.0M
Q3 24
$647.0M
$-143.2M
Q2 24
$406.0M
$-14.6M
FCF Margin
HLT
HLT
IRM
IRM
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.6%
-0.9%
Q3 25
25.2%
-14.6%
Q2 25
20.2%
-10.6%
Q1 25
16.1%
-30.0%
Q4 24
19.2%
-11.8%
Q3 24
22.6%
-9.2%
Q2 24
13.8%
-1.0%
Capex Intensity
HLT
HLT
IRM
IRM
Q1 26
0.3%
Q4 25
1.0%
28.0%
Q3 25
0.9%
29.9%
Q2 25
0.7%
32.5%
Q1 25
0.7%
42.4%
Q4 24
1.7%
39.1%
Q3 24
0.6%
25.4%
Q2 24
0.5%
25.9%
Cash Conversion
HLT
HLT
IRM
IRM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.68×
5.37×
Q3 25
1.94×
3.10×
Q2 25
1.50×
Q1 25
1.51×
12.15×
Q4 24
1.15×
4.08×
Q3 24
1.93×
Q2 24
1.00×
11.04×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

HLT
HLT

Segment breakdown not available.

IRM
IRM

Storage Rental$1.1B58%
Services$781.9M42%

Related Comparisons