vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hilton Worldwide (HLT) and Parker Hannifin (PH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Parker Hannifin is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.2B vs $2.9B, roughly 1.8× Hilton Worldwide). On growth, Parker Hannifin posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.1% vs 9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Parker Hannifin's revenue compounded faster (1.0% CAGR vs -0.2%).
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. is an American multinational hospitality company that manages and franchises a broad portfolio of hotels, resorts, and timeshare properties. Founded by Conrad Hilton in May 1919, the company is now led by Christopher J. Nassetta. Hilton is headquartered in Tysons, Virginia, United States.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.
HLT vs PH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $5.2B |
| Net Profit | $383.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.3% |
| Operating Margin | 23.1% | 22.8% |
| Net Margin | 13.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 27.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.66 | $6.60 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $5.2B |
| Q1 26 | $383.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $297.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $440.0M | $923.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $300.0M | $961.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $505.0M | $948.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $344.0M | $698.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $421.0M | $785.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.9% |
| Q1 26 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.5% | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.9% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.8% | 22.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 22.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.6% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.6% | 21.1% |
| Q1 26 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.0% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.1% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.0% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 15.1% |
| Q1 26 | $1.66 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.27 | $6.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.78 | $6.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.84 | $7.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.23 | $7.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.05 | $7.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.38 | $5.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.67 | $6.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $427.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $12.4M | $7.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $14.3B |
| Total Assets | — | $30.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $918.0M | $427.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $473.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $371.0M | $467.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $731.0M | $408.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $395.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $371.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $731.0M | $422.0M |
| Q1 26 | $12.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.3B | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.6B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9B | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6B | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-5.4B | $14.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9B | $13.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6B | $13.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.4B | $13.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.7B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5B | $12.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.1B | $12.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.8B | $30.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.6B | $30.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.9B | $29.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.0B | $28.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.5B | $28.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7B | $29.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7B | $29.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.59× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $862.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $768.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 14.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $3.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $203.0M | $862.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $816.0M | $782.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $658.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $452.0M | $630.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $582.0M | $934.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $664.0M | $744.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $421.0M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $173.0M | $768.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $787.0M | $693.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $433.0M | $542.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $534.0M | $813.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $647.0M | $648.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $406.0M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 21.6% |
| Q1 26 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.94× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.50× | 1.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.51× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.15× | 0.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.93× | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.00× | 1.58× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HLT
Segment breakdown not available.
PH
| Filtration And Engineered Materials | $1.5B | 28% |
| Other | $1.1B | 22% |
| Motion Systems | $893.0M | 17% |
| Commercial Aftermarket | $619.0M | 12% |
| Commercial Original Equipment Manufacturer | $561.0M | 11% |
| Defense Original Equipment Manufacturer | $305.0M | 6% |
| Defense Aftermarket | $221.0M | 4% |
