vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP INC (HLX) and OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC (OII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($692.4M vs $287.9M, roughly 2.4× HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP INC). OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC runs the higher net margin — 5.2% vs -4.7%, a 9.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs -13.8%). HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($59.0M vs $-76.5M). Over the past eight quarters, OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC's revenue compounded faster (1.8% CAGR vs -11.2%).
Helix Energy Solutions Inc., known as Cal Dive International prior to 2006, is an American oil and gas services company headquartered in Houston, Texas. The company is a global provider of offshore services in well intervention and ROV operations of new and existing oil and gas fields.
Oceaneering International, Inc. is a subsea engineering and applied technology company based in Houston, Texas, U.S. that provides engineered services and hardware to customers who operate in marine, space, and other environments.
HLX vs OII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $287.9M | $692.4M |
| Net Profit | $-13.4M | $36.1M |
| Gross Margin | 3.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | -4.7% | 5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.8% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -262.1% | -79.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $287.9M | $692.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $334.2M | $668.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $377.0M | $742.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $302.3M | $698.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $278.1M | $674.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $355.1M | $713.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $342.4M | $679.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $364.8M | $668.8M |
| Q1 26 | $-13.4M | $36.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.3M | $177.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.1M | $71.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1M | $50.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.1M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.5M | $41.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.5% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.2% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.0% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | -4.7% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | 5.2% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.09 | $0.36 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $1.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $0.71 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.02 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.13 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $501.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $303.8M | $488.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.20× | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $501.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $445.2M | $695.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $338.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.7M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $368.0M | $504.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $324.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $275.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $303.8M | $488.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $308.0M | $487.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $315.2M | $482.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $318.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $907.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $842.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $773.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $714.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $698.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $651.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | 0.20× | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.19× | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.21× | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.21× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $61.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $59.0M | $-76.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 20.5% | -11.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $167.4M | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $61.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $113.2M | $221.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $101.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.1M | $77.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.4M | $-80.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.0M | $128.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.7M | $91.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.2M | $52.6M |
| Q1 26 | $59.0M | $-76.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.5M | $190.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-21.6M | $46.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | $-106.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.5M | $94.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.5M | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.2M | $29.8M |
| Q1 26 | 20.5% | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.2% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.1% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.4% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.4% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | 1.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.68× | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.10× | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.35× | -1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.88× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.38× | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HLX
Segment breakdown not available.
OII
| Backlog at end of period | $492.0M | 71% |
| Other | $162.8M | 24% |
| ROV days available | $22.5M | 3% |
| ROV days utilized | $15.1M | 2% |
