vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Hologic (HOLX) and TEREX CORP (TEX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

TEREX CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.3× Hologic). Hologic runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs 4.8%, a 12.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TEREX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.2% vs 2.5%). Hologic produced more free cash flow last quarter ($215.2M vs $171.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Hologic's revenue compounded faster (1.5% CAGR vs 1.0%).

Hologic, Inc. is an American medical technology company primarily focused on women's health; it sells medical devices for diagnostics, surgery, and medical imaging.

Terex Corporation is an American company and worldwide manufacturer of materials processing machinery, waste and recycling equipment, mobile elevating work platforms, and equipment for the electric utility industry. Terex does business in the Americas, Europe, Australia and Asia Pacific.

HOLX vs TEX — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TEX
TEX
1.3× larger
TEX
$1.3B
$1.0B
HOLX
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TEX
TEX
+3.7% gap
TEX
6.2%
2.5%
HOLX
Higher net margin
HOLX
HOLX
12.3% more per $
HOLX
17.1%
4.8%
TEX
More free cash flow
HOLX
HOLX
$44.2M more FCF
HOLX
$215.2M
$171.0M
TEX
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
HOLX
HOLX
Annualised
HOLX
1.5%
1.0%
TEX

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Revenue
$1.0B
$1.3B
Net Profit
$179.1M
$63.0M
Gross Margin
56.0%
18.8%
Operating Margin
22.6%
10.4%
Net Margin
17.1%
4.8%
Revenue YoY
2.5%
6.2%
Net Profit YoY
-10.9%
2963.6%
EPS (diluted)
$0.79
$0.95

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Q4 25
$1.0B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$1.0B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$1.0B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$1.0B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.0B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$988.0M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.0B
$1.4B
Q1 24
$1.0B
$1.3B
Net Profit
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Q4 25
$179.1M
$63.0M
Q3 25
$187.2M
$65.0M
Q2 25
$194.9M
$72.0M
Q1 25
$-17.4M
$21.0M
Q4 24
$201.0M
$-2.2M
Q3 24
$178.6M
$88.0M
Q2 24
$194.5M
$140.7M
Q1 24
$169.9M
$108.5M
Gross Margin
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Q4 25
56.0%
18.8%
Q3 25
55.6%
20.3%
Q2 25
56.3%
19.6%
Q1 25
37.5%
18.7%
Q4 24
56.8%
15.9%
Q3 24
56.4%
20.2%
Q2 24
55.4%
23.8%
Q1 24
53.3%
23.0%
Operating Margin
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Q4 25
22.6%
10.4%
Q3 25
22.6%
10.1%
Q2 25
24.9%
8.7%
Q1 25
-0.7%
5.6%
Q4 24
22.5%
4.2%
Q3 24
23.3%
10.1%
Q2 24
24.1%
14.0%
Q1 24
20.7%
12.2%
Net Margin
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Q4 25
17.1%
4.8%
Q3 25
17.8%
4.7%
Q2 25
19.0%
4.8%
Q1 25
-1.7%
1.7%
Q4 24
19.7%
-0.2%
Q3 24
18.1%
7.3%
Q2 24
19.2%
10.2%
Q1 24
16.7%
8.4%
EPS (diluted)
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Q4 25
$0.79
$0.95
Q3 25
$0.84
$0.98
Q2 25
$0.86
$1.09
Q1 25
$-0.08
$0.31
Q4 24
$0.87
$-0.03
Q3 24
$0.75
$1.31
Q2 24
$0.82
$2.08
Q1 24
$0.72
$1.60

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$2.4B
$772.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.5B
$2.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$5.2B
$2.1B
Total Assets
$9.2B
$6.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.48×
1.23×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Q4 25
$2.4B
$772.0M
Q3 25
$2.2B
$509.0M
Q2 25
$1.9B
$374.0M
Q1 25
$1.6B
$298.0M
Q4 24
$2.0B
$388.0M
Q3 24
$2.3B
$352.0M
Q2 24
$2.4B
$319.3M
Q1 24
$2.2B
$364.9M
Total Debt
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Q4 25
$2.5B
$2.6B
Q3 25
$2.5B
Q2 25
$2.5B
Q1 25
$2.5B
Q4 24
$2.5B
$2.6B
Q3 24
$2.5B
Q2 24
$2.5B
Q1 24
$2.6B
Stockholders' Equity
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Q4 25
$5.2B
$2.1B
Q3 25
$5.0B
$2.0B
Q2 25
$4.8B
$2.0B
Q1 25
$4.6B
$1.8B
Q4 24
$4.8B
$1.8B
Q3 24
$5.1B
$2.0B
Q2 24
$5.0B
$1.8B
Q1 24
$4.8B
$1.7B
Total Assets
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Q4 25
$9.2B
$6.1B
Q3 25
$9.0B
$6.2B
Q2 25
$8.8B
$6.2B
Q1 25
$8.5B
$5.8B
Q4 24
$8.7B
$5.7B
Q3 24
$9.2B
$3.8B
Q2 24
$8.9B
$3.8B
Q1 24
$8.7B
$3.8B
Debt / Equity
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Q4 25
0.48×
1.23×
Q3 25
0.50×
Q2 25
0.52×
Q1 25
0.55×
Q4 24
0.53×
1.41×
Q3 24
0.49×
Q2 24
0.51×
Q1 24
0.53×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$229.9M
$205.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$215.2M
$171.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
20.5%
13.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.4%
2.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.28×
3.25×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.0B
$322.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Q4 25
$229.9M
$205.0M
Q3 25
$355.1M
$154.0M
Q2 25
$343.3M
$102.0M
Q1 25
$169.4M
$-21.0M
Q4 24
$189.3M
$177.0M
Q3 24
$367.0M
$116.4M
Q2 24
$405.8M
$66.5M
Q1 24
$292.4M
$-33.9M
Free Cash Flow
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Q4 25
$215.2M
$171.0M
Q3 25
$341.4M
$130.0M
Q2 25
$330.5M
$78.0M
Q1 25
$153.9M
$-57.0M
Q4 24
$172.5M
$128.0M
Q3 24
$350.6M
$87.4M
Q2 24
$385.3M
$42.5M
Q1 24
$279.6M
$-68.9M
FCF Margin
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Q4 25
20.5%
13.0%
Q3 25
32.5%
9.4%
Q2 25
32.3%
5.2%
Q1 25
15.3%
-4.6%
Q4 24
16.9%
10.3%
Q3 24
35.5%
7.2%
Q2 24
38.1%
3.1%
Q1 24
27.5%
-5.3%
Capex Intensity
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Q4 25
1.4%
2.6%
Q3 25
1.3%
1.7%
Q2 25
1.3%
1.6%
Q1 25
1.5%
2.9%
Q4 24
1.6%
3.9%
Q3 24
1.7%
2.4%
Q2 24
2.0%
1.7%
Q1 24
1.3%
2.7%
Cash Conversion
HOLX
HOLX
TEX
TEX
Q4 25
1.28×
3.25×
Q3 25
1.90×
2.37×
Q2 25
1.76×
1.42×
Q1 25
-1.00×
Q4 24
0.94×
Q3 24
2.05×
1.32×
Q2 24
2.09×
0.47×
Q1 24
1.72×
-0.31×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

HOLX
HOLX

Molecular Diagnostics$255.3M24%
Breast Imaging$219.9M21%
Services$216.4M21%
Capital Equipment Componentsand Software$187.2M18%
Cytology Perinatal$76.0M7%
Interventional Breast Solutions$71.2M7%
Blood Screening$8.4M1%
Other Typeof Revenue$5.4M1%

TEX
TEX

Aerials Segment$466.0M35%
Materials Processing Segment$428.0M32%
Materials Processing Equipment$279.0M21%
Specialty Equipment$148.0M11%

Related Comparisons