vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) and SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $927.0M, roughly 1.1× Robinhood Markets, Inc.). Robinhood Markets, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 36.2% vs -0.9%, a 37.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -27.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.6% CAGR vs 7.5%).
Robinhood Markets, Inc. is an American financial services company based in Menlo Park, California. It provides an electronic trading platform that facilitates trades of stocks, exchange-traded funds, options, index options, futures contracts, event contracts on prediction markets, and cryptocurrency. It also offers cryptocurrency wallets, wealth management, credit cards and other banking services, some in partnership with banks insured by the FDIC, as well as a news website, Sherwood.News.
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. is a leading North American wholesale distributor of landscape supplies. Its offerings cover irrigation components, outdoor lighting, hardscape materials, nursery plants, landscaping tools and related accessories. It mainly serves professional landscapers, contractors, golf course operators, municipal maintenance teams, with a wide branch network across the U.S. and Canada.
HOOD vs SITE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $927.0M | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | $336.0M | $-9.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -0.5% |
| Net Margin | 36.2% | -0.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -27.7% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2.9% | 58.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $336.00 | $-0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $927.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $989.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $927.0M | $939.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $637.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $682.0M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $336.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $605.0M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $556.0M | $59.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $386.0M | $129.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $336.0M | $-27.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $916.0M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $150.0M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $188.0M | $120.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 51.5% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.7% | 12.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.0% | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.0% | -2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.0% | 12.0% |
| Q1 26 | 36.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 47.2% | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.2% | -2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.3% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.6% | 8.5% |
| Q1 26 | $336.00 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.65 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.61 | $1.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.42 | $2.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.37 | $-0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.00 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.17 | $0.97 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | $2.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.3B | $190.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $385.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.2B | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $38.1B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $190.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3B | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $78.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4B | $56.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $107.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $85.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $71.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $385.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $388.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $469.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $503.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $388.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $410.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $480.2M |
| Q1 26 | $9.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $38.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3B | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.30× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $642.0M | $164.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $150.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 14.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.91× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $246.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $642.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-937.0M | $164.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6B | $128.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $136.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $642.0M | $-129.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.4B | $119.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $115.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | $147.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $150.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $118.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $122.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-144.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $109.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $105.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $135.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -15.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q1 26 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.55× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.83× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.09× | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.53× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.08× | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.29× | 1.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HOOD
| Transaction-based revenues | $583.0M | 63% |
| Other | $290.0M | 31% |
| Other revenues | $54.0M | 6% |
SITE
| Landscaping Products | $798.4M | 76% |
| Agronomic | $247.2M | 24% |
