vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of HOPE BANCORP INC (HOPE) and Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

HOPE BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($141.0M vs $41.6M, roughly 3.4× Nine Energy Service, Inc.). Nine Energy Service, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 259.3% vs 20.9%, a 238.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HOPE BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.0% vs -68.5%). Over the past eight quarters, HOPE BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs -43.9%).

Bank of Hope is an American bank, based in Los Angeles, that focuses on the Korean American community. The bank was first established on December 30, 1980, under the name Wilshire Bank.

Xcel Energy Inc. is a U.S. regulated electric utility and natural gas delivery company based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, serving approximately 3.9 million electricity customers and 2.2 million natural gas customers across parts of eight states as of mid-2025. It consists of four operating subsidiaries: Northern States Power-Minnesota, Northern States Power-Wisconsin, Public Service Company of Colorado, and Southwestern Public Service Co.

HOPE vs NINE — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
HOPE
HOPE
3.4× larger
HOPE
$141.0M
$41.6M
NINE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
HOPE
HOPE
+89.6% gap
HOPE
21.0%
-68.5%
NINE
Higher net margin
NINE
NINE
238.4% more per $
NINE
259.3%
20.9%
HOPE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
HOPE
HOPE
Annualised
HOPE
9.8%
-43.9%
NINE

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
HOPE
HOPE
NINE
NINE
Revenue
$141.0M
$41.6M
Net Profit
$29.5M
$107.9M
Gross Margin
9.1%
Operating Margin
Net Margin
20.9%
259.3%
Revenue YoY
21.0%
-68.5%
Net Profit YoY
EPS (diluted)
$0.23
$2.65

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
HOPE
HOPE
NINE
NINE
Q1 26
$141.0M
$41.6M
Q4 25
$145.8M
$132.2M
Q3 25
$141.9M
$132.0M
Q2 25
$94.5M
$147.3M
Q1 25
$116.5M
$150.5M
Q4 24
$118.0M
$141.4M
Q3 24
$116.6M
$138.2M
Q2 24
$116.9M
$132.4M
Net Profit
HOPE
HOPE
NINE
NINE
Q1 26
$29.5M
$107.9M
Q4 25
$-19.2M
Q3 25
$30.8M
$-14.6M
Q2 25
$-24.8M
$-10.4M
Q1 25
$21.1M
$-7.1M
Q4 24
$-8.8M
Q3 24
$24.2M
$-10.1M
Q2 24
$25.3M
$-14.0M
Gross Margin
HOPE
HOPE
NINE
NINE
Q1 26
9.1%
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Operating Margin
HOPE
HOPE
NINE
NINE
Q1 26
Q4 25
26.8%
-4.2%
Q3 25
25.6%
-0.9%
Q2 25
-27.6%
2.3%
Q1 25
23.9%
3.7%
Q4 24
25.8%
2.5%
Q3 24
27.5%
1.8%
Q2 24
29.5%
-1.1%
Net Margin
HOPE
HOPE
NINE
NINE
Q1 26
20.9%
259.3%
Q4 25
-14.5%
Q3 25
21.7%
-11.1%
Q2 25
-26.2%
-7.1%
Q1 25
18.1%
-4.7%
Q4 24
-6.3%
Q3 24
20.7%
-7.3%
Q2 24
21.6%
-10.6%
EPS (diluted)
HOPE
HOPE
NINE
NINE
Q1 26
$0.23
$2.65
Q4 25
$0.27
$-0.47
Q3 25
$0.24
$-0.35
Q2 25
$-0.19
$-0.25
Q1 25
$0.17
$-0.18
Q4 24
$0.20
$-0.21
Q3 24
$0.20
$-0.26
Q2 24
$0.21
$-0.40

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
HOPE
HOPE
NINE
NINE
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$11.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$94.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.3B
Total Assets
$18.7B
$326.0M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
HOPE
HOPE
NINE
NINE
Q1 26
$11.2M
Q4 25
$18.4M
Q3 25
$14.4M
Q2 25
$14.2M
Q1 25
$17.3M
Q4 24
$27.9M
Q3 24
$15.7M
Q2 24
$26.0M
Total Debt
HOPE
HOPE
NINE
NINE
Q1 26
$94.4M
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
HOPE
HOPE
NINE
NINE
Q1 26
$2.3B
Q4 25
$2.3B
$-115.0M
Q3 25
$2.3B
$-95.9M
Q2 25
$2.2B
$-81.7M
Q1 25
$2.2B
$-72.1M
Q4 24
$2.1B
$-66.1M
Q3 24
$2.2B
$-57.6M
Q2 24
$2.1B
$-49.7M
Total Assets
HOPE
HOPE
NINE
NINE
Q1 26
$18.7B
$326.0M
Q4 25
$18.5B
$339.5M
Q3 25
$18.5B
$340.7M
Q2 25
$18.5B
$361.2M
Q1 25
$17.1B
$359.2M
Q4 24
$17.1B
$360.1M
Q3 24
$17.4B
$353.2M
Q2 24
$17.4B
$381.7M

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons