vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HOPE BANCORP INC (HOPE) and Nayax Ltd. (NYAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HOPE BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($141.0M vs $78.1M, roughly 1.8× Nayax Ltd.). HOPE BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 20.9% vs -3.9%, a 24.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Nayax Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (39.0% vs 21.0%).
Bank of Hope is an American bank, based in Los Angeles, that focuses on the Korean American community. The bank was first established on December 30, 1980, under the name Wilshire Bank.
Nayax Ltd. is a global fintech company that offers cashless, telemetry, management, monitoring, and business intelligence (BI) products and services for the vending, unattended, and other retail industries.
HOPE vs NYAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $141.0M | $78.1M |
| Net Profit | $29.5M | $-3.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 1.2% |
| Net Margin | 20.9% | -3.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.0% | 39.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 24.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.23 | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $141.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $145.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $116.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.9M | $78.1M |
| Q1 26 | $29.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.3M | $-3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 44.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -27.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.5% | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | -3.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $61.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $158.7M |
| Total Assets | $18.7B | $434.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $61.9M |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $158.7M |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.4B | $434.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $9.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $164.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.6M | $9.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-28.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 103.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.01× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
