vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HOPE BANCORP INC (HOPE) and UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.2M vs $141.0M, roughly 1.0× HOPE BANCORP INC). UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ runs the higher net margin — 25.2% vs 20.9%, a 4.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HOPE BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.0% vs -14.5%). Over the past eight quarters, HOPE BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs -5.3%).
Bank of Hope is an American bank, based in Los Angeles, that focuses on the Korean American community. The bank was first established on December 30, 1980, under the name Wilshire Bank.
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
HOPE vs OLED — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $141.0M | $142.2M |
| Net Profit | $29.5M | $35.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 74.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 30.1% |
| Net Margin | 20.9% | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.0% | -14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -44.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.23 | $0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $141.0M | $142.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $145.8M | $172.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.9M | $139.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.5M | $171.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $116.5M | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.0M | $162.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.6M | $161.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.9M | $158.5M |
| Q1 26 | $29.5M | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.8M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.8M | $67.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.1M | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.2M | $66.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.3M | $52.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 75.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.6% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -27.6% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.9% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.8% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.5% | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.5% | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | 20.9% | 25.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.2% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | 38.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.7% | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 33.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.23 | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.27 | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.24 | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.19 | $1.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $1.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.20 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $1.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $516.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | — |
| Total Assets | $18.7B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $516.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $602.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $603.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $571.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $492.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $551.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $530.5M |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.4B | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $108.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $108.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $164.5M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.7M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.4M | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.7M | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.7M | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | $79.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.6M | $67.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.5M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.0M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.9M | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.1M | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-28.1M | $57.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 103.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.2% | 60.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.6% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.6% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.0% | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.68× | 2.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.26× | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.01× | 1.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HOPE
Segment breakdown not available.
OLED
| Material sales | $83.7M | 59% |
| Royalty and license fees | $54.2M | 38% |
| Contract research services | $4.3M | 3% |
