vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HOPE BANCORP INC (HOPE) and Planet Image International Ltd (YIBO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HOPE BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($141.0M vs $80.7M, roughly 1.7× Planet Image International Ltd). HOPE BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 20.9% vs -0.3%, a 21.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Bank of Hope is an American bank, based in Los Angeles, that focuses on the Korean American community. The bank was first established on December 30, 1980, under the name Wilshire Bank.
Planet Labs PBC, known as "Planet.", is a publicly traded American Earth imaging company based in San Francisco, California. Their goal is to image the entirety of the Earth daily to monitor changes and pinpoint trends.
HOPE vs YIBO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $141.0M | $80.7M |
| Net Profit | $29.5M | $-213.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 20.9% | -0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.23 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $141.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $145.8M | $80.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.5M | $74.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $116.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.9M | $77.3M |
| Q1 26 | $29.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-213.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-24.8M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.3M | $4.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -27.6% | -14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.5% | 7.5% |
| Q1 26 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -26.2% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.27 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $54.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $57.9M |
| Total Assets | $18.7B | $154.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $54.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $53.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $57.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $58.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $53.9M |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.5B | $154.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.5B | $140.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.4B | $139.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $2.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 2.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $164.5M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.4M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.5M | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $106.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-28.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 103.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | -6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.01× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
