vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hour Loop, Inc (HOUR) and ImmunityBio, Inc. (IBRX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hour Loop, Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($56.1M vs $38.3M, roughly 1.5× ImmunityBio, Inc.). Hour Loop, Inc runs the higher net margin — -1.2% vs -161.8%, a 160.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ImmunityBio, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (407.0% vs 3.0%). Hour Loop, Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.0M vs $-71.3M).
Hour Loop, Inc. is an e-commerce retail company that offers a diverse portfolio of products including home goods, apparel, toys, electronics accessories, and daily consumer essentials. It primarily operates through leading third-party online marketplaces, with its core customer base concentrated in North America, focusing on delivering affordable, high-value daily products to mass consumers.
ImmunityBio, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing next-generation immunotherapies and vaccine candidates targeting multiple cancer types and infectious diseases. It operates mainly in the U.S. market, with core R&D segments including cell therapy, antibody therapeutics, and targeted vaccine platforms designed to enhance patient treatment outcomes.
HOUR vs IBRX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $56.1M | $38.3M |
| Net Profit | $-657.3K | $-61.9M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 99.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.5% | -169.0% |
| Net Margin | -1.2% | -161.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.0% | 407.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 57.0% | -4.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $56.1M | $38.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.4M | $32.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.1M | $26.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.4M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-657.3K | $-61.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $530.6K | $-67.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-92.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $654.5K | $-129.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | $-59.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $469.6K | $-85.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $649.1K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 49.6% | 99.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.4% | 99.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.2% | 99.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.7% | 99.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 58.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.5% | -169.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | -173.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | -269.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | -390.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.5% | -919.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | -1314.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.2% | -161.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | -209.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | -350.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -784.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | -783.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | -1404.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.02 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.03 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $242.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0M | $-500.5M |
| Total Assets | $23.8M | $501.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $242.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $257.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $153.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $61.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $149.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $130.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $-500.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7M | $-524.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $-570.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8M | $-591.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $-489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | $-745.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | $501.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.6M | $519.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.0M | $402.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $303.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | $382.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.4M | $364.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.7M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.0M | $-70.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.0M | $-71.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.3% | -186.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.5M | $-308.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $-70.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $500.4K | $-68.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-901.5K | $-79.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.9K | $-85.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | $-85.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $-98.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $456.2K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $492.9K | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $-71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $449.3K | $-69.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-901.6K | $-80.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.6K | $-87.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | $-87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $-101.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $439.4K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $475.1K | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | -186.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | -217.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | -305.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | -526.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | -1155.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.0% | -1663.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 45.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.77× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.46× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
