vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hour Loop, Inc (HOUR) and STEM, INC. (STEM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hour Loop, Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($56.1M vs $47.1M, roughly 1.2× STEM, INC.). Hour Loop, Inc runs the higher net margin — -1.2% vs -33.9%, a 32.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hour Loop, Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.0% vs -15.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Hour Loop, Inc's revenue compounded faster (50.7% CAGR vs 36.1%).
Hour Loop, Inc. is an e-commerce retail company that offers a diverse portfolio of products including home goods, apparel, toys, electronics accessories, and daily consumer essentials. It primarily operates through leading third-party online marketplaces, with its core customer base concentrated in North America, focusing on delivering affordable, high-value daily products to mass consumers.
StemCells, Inc. is a public biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Newark, California, that is developing purified human neural stem cells (HuCNS-SCs) in the hopes of treating central nervous system disorders and paralysis. StemCells' HuCNS-SCs have the ability to differentiate into the three main types of cells found in the central nervous system: neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes.
HOUR vs STEM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $56.1M | $47.1M |
| Net Profit | $-657.3K | $-16.0M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 48.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.5% | -17.7% |
| Net Margin | -1.2% | -33.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.0% | -15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 57.0% | 68.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $-4.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $56.1M | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.4M | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.1M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.4M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.1M | $34.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.7M | $25.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-657.3K | $-16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $530.6K | $-23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $654.5K | $-25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | $-51.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $469.6K | $-148.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $649.1K | $-582.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $-72.3M |
| Q4 25 | 49.6% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.4% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.2% | 33.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.7% | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.7% | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.8% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.7% | 27.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 58.6% | -95.0% |
| Q4 25 | -1.5% | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | -33.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | -34.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | -65.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.5% | -84.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | -493.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | -1705.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | -267.0% |
| Q4 25 | -1.2% | -33.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | -62.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 527.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -76.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | -91.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | -506.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | -1712.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.3% | -283.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | $-4.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $-2.84 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-1.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.02 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $-15.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $-18.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $-71.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.03 | $-0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $48.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0M | $-249.4M |
| Total Assets | $23.8M | $308.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $43.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $58.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $56.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $75.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $89.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9M | $112.8M |
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | $-249.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7M | $-235.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $-214.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8M | $-417.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $-398.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | $-344.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $-203.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.5M | $371.6M |
| Q4 25 | $23.8M | $308.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.6M | $362.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.0M | $379.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $405.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | $437.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.4M | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.2M | $691.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.7M | $1.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.0M | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $500.4K | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-901.5K | $-21.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.9K | $8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $456.2K | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $492.9K | $-621.0K |
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $449.3K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-901.6K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.6K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $439.4K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $475.1K | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.77× | -0.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.46× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
