vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Healthcare Realty Trust Inc (HR) and KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Healthcare Realty Trust Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($286.3M vs $272.2M, roughly 1.1× KILROY REALTY CORP). Healthcare Realty Trust Inc runs the higher net margin — 183.4% vs 6.3%, a 177.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KILROY REALTY CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-5.0% vs -7.6%). Over the past eight quarters, KILROY REALTY CORP's revenue compounded faster (-1.2% CAGR vs -6.4%).

Duke Realty was a real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Indianapolis, Indiana, that invested in industrial properties. As of December 31, 2021, it owned or jointly controlled 548 primarily industrial properties containing 162.7 million rentable square feet. In October 2022, it was acquired by Prologis.

Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.

HR vs KRC — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
HR
HR
1.1× larger
HR
$286.3M
$272.2M
KRC
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KRC
KRC
+2.6% gap
KRC
-5.0%
-7.6%
HR
Higher net margin
HR
HR
177.1% more per $
HR
183.4%
6.3%
KRC
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KRC
KRC
Annualised
KRC
-1.2%
-6.4%
HR

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
HR
HR
KRC
KRC
Revenue
$286.3M
$272.2M
Net Profit
$14.6M
$17.1M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
183.4%
6.3%
Revenue YoY
-7.6%
-5.0%
Net Profit YoY
113.5%
-73.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.04
$0.11

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
HR
HR
KRC
KRC
Q4 25
$286.3M
$272.2M
Q3 25
$297.8M
$279.7M
Q2 25
$297.5M
$289.9M
Q1 25
$299.0M
$270.8M
Q4 24
$309.8M
$286.4M
Q3 24
$315.4M
$289.9M
Q2 24
$316.3M
$280.7M
Q1 24
$326.8M
$278.6M
Net Profit
HR
HR
KRC
KRC
Q4 25
$14.6M
$17.1M
Q3 25
$-57.7M
$162.3M
Q2 25
$-157.9M
$79.6M
Q1 25
$-44.9M
$43.7M
Q4 24
$-108.2M
$65.0M
Q3 24
$-93.0M
$57.7M
Q2 24
$-143.8M
$54.5M
Q1 24
$-310.8M
$55.7M
Net Margin
HR
HR
KRC
KRC
Q4 25
183.4%
6.3%
Q3 25
-19.4%
58.0%
Q2 25
-53.1%
27.4%
Q1 25
-15.0%
16.1%
Q4 24
-1924.1%
22.7%
Q3 24
-29.5%
19.9%
Q2 24
-45.5%
19.4%
Q1 24
-95.1%
20.0%
EPS (diluted)
HR
HR
KRC
KRC
Q4 25
$0.04
$0.11
Q3 25
$-0.17
$1.31
Q2 25
$-0.45
$0.57
Q1 25
$-0.13
$0.33
Q4 24
$-0.34
$0.50
Q3 24
$-0.26
$0.44
Q2 24
$-0.39
$0.41
Q1 24
$-0.82
$0.42

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
HR
HR
KRC
KRC
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$26.2M
$179.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.9B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.6B
$5.4B
Total Assets
$9.2B
$10.9B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.85×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
HR
HR
KRC
KRC
Q4 25
$26.2M
$179.3M
Q3 25
$43.3M
$372.4M
Q2 25
$25.5M
$193.1M
Q1 25
$25.7M
$146.7M
Q4 24
$68.9M
$165.7M
Q3 24
$22.8M
$625.4M
Q2 24
$41.8M
$835.9M
Q1 24
$26.2M
$855.0M
Total Debt
HR
HR
KRC
KRC
Q4 25
$3.9B
Q3 25
$4.5B
Q2 25
$4.7B
Q1 25
$4.7B
Q4 24
$4.7B
Q3 24
$5.0B
Q2 24
$5.1B
Q1 24
$5.1B
Stockholders' Equity
HR
HR
KRC
KRC
Q4 25
$4.6B
$5.4B
Q3 25
$4.7B
$5.5B
Q2 25
$4.8B
$5.4B
Q1 25
$5.1B
$5.4B
Q4 24
$5.2B
$5.4B
Q3 24
$5.5B
$5.4B
Q2 24
$5.9B
$5.4B
Q1 24
$6.4B
$5.4B
Total Assets
HR
HR
KRC
KRC
Q4 25
$9.2B
$10.9B
Q3 25
$9.9B
$11.0B
Q2 25
$10.2B
$10.9B
Q1 25
$10.5B
$10.9B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$10.9B
Q3 24
$11.2B
$11.4B
Q2 24
$11.8B
$11.5B
Q1 24
$12.3B
$11.6B
Debt / Equity
HR
HR
KRC
KRC
Q4 25
0.85×
Q3 25
0.96×
Q2 25
0.97×
Q1 25
0.93×
Q4 24
0.89×
Q3 24
0.90×
Q2 24
0.87×
Q1 24
0.80×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
HR
HR
KRC
KRC
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$457.1M
$566.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$450.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
165.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
42.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
31.33×
33.10×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$833.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
HR
HR
KRC
KRC
Q4 25
$457.1M
$566.3M
Q3 25
$113.8M
$176.6M
Q2 25
$163.2M
$143.7M
Q1 25
$47.8M
$136.9M
Q4 24
$501.6M
$541.1M
Q3 24
$119.3M
$176.3M
Q2 24
$168.2M
$88.7M
Q1 24
$76.2M
$167.9M
Free Cash Flow
HR
HR
KRC
KRC
Q4 25
$450.3M
Q3 25
$148.7M
Q2 25
$118.4M
Q1 25
$115.6M
Q4 24
$440.8M
Q3 24
$147.2M
Q2 24
$69.5M
Q1 24
$151.9M
FCF Margin
HR
HR
KRC
KRC
Q4 25
165.4%
Q3 25
53.1%
Q2 25
40.9%
Q1 25
42.7%
Q4 24
153.9%
Q3 24
50.8%
Q2 24
24.7%
Q1 24
54.5%
Capex Intensity
HR
HR
KRC
KRC
Q4 25
42.6%
Q3 25
10.0%
Q2 25
8.7%
Q1 25
7.9%
Q4 24
35.0%
Q3 24
10.1%
Q2 24
6.8%
Q1 24
5.7%
Cash Conversion
HR
HR
KRC
KRC
Q4 25
31.33×
33.10×
Q3 25
1.09×
Q2 25
1.81×
Q1 25
3.13×
Q4 24
8.32×
Q3 24
3.06×
Q2 24
1.63×
Q1 24
3.01×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons