vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HERC HOLDINGS INC (HRI) and LITTELFUSE INC (LFUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HERC HOLDINGS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $593.9M, roughly 1.9× LITTELFUSE INC). HERC HOLDINGS INC runs the higher net margin — -2.1% vs -40.8%, a 38.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HERC HOLDINGS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.3% vs 12.2%). LITTELFUSE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($119.7M vs $94.0M). Over the past eight quarters, HERC HOLDINGS INC's revenue compounded faster (1343.1% CAGR vs 5.3%).
Herc Holdings Inc. is a leading North American equipment rental service provider. It offers rental assets including heavy construction machinery, power tools, temporary power and climate control systems, serving clients across construction, industrial, events, infrastructure and government segments, with operations across the U.S. and Canada.
Littelfuse is a leading global manufacturer of circuit protection, sensing, and control components. Its product portfolio includes fuses, semiconductor protection devices, power switches, sensors, and circuit breakers, serving automotive, industrial electronics, consumer electronics, telecommunications, and renewable energy sectors worldwide to boost equipment safety and reliability.
HRI vs LFUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $593.9M |
| Net Profit | $-24.0M | $-242.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -37.5% |
| Net Margin | -2.1% | -40.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.3% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | -367.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.72 | $-9.71 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.1M | $593.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $624.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $613.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $554.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $529.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $567.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $558.5M |
| Q1 26 | $-24.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-99.9M | $-242.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.8M | $57.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.1M | $43.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.3M | $-51.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $45.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.3% | 38.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.1% | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.0% | 37.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.4% | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -77.4% | -37.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -153.5% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -147.4% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -242.7% | 12.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -206.3% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | -2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -331.7% | -40.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -74.1% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -171.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -332.8% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -250.3% | -9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.1% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.36 | $-9.71 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $2.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.15 | $1.75 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.15 | $-2.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $43.0M | $563.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $802.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $13.6B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $43.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $550.7M | $563.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $432.8M | $815.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.6M | $685.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $619.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | $725.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $630.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $562.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $802.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $805.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $810.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $805.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $300.0K | $856.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $867.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $863.5M |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $437.8M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $486.1M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.8M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.1M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | $13.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $550.2M | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.0M | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.6M | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.6M | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.02× | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $277.0M | $138.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $94.0M | $119.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.3% | 20.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.6% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $60.1M | $366.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $277.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.7M | $138.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.0M | $146.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.4M | $82.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.7M | $65.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.1M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $80.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $69.4M |
| Q1 26 | $94.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-14.3M | $119.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.1M | $131.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.5M | $72.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $42.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.1M | $134.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $65.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $50.3M |
| Q1 26 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -47.6% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -110.2% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -135.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -160.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -197.1% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HRI
| Equipment rental | $981.0M | 86% |
| Sales of rental equipment | $138.0M | 12% |
| Sales of new equipment, parts and supplies | $13.0M | 1% |
| Service and other revenue | $7.0M | 1% |
LFUS
| Electronics Passive Products And Sensors | $174.9M | 29% |
| Electronics Semiconductor | $170.3M | 29% |
| Industrial Products | $85.0M | 14% |
| Commercial Vehicle Products | $76.2M | 13% |
| Passenger Car Products | $72.8M | 12% |
| Automotive Sensors | $14.7M | 2% |
| Dortmund Fab | $12.5M | 2% |
