vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Hormel Foods (HRL) and Waste Management (WM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Waste Management is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.2B vs $3.2B, roughly 2.0× Hormel Foods). Waste Management runs the higher net margin — 11.6% vs -1.8%, a 13.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Waste Management posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.5% vs 1.5%). Waste Management produced more free cash flow last quarter ($981.0M vs $231.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Waste Management's revenue compounded faster (7.4% CAGR vs 3.1%).

Hormel Foods Corporation, doing business as Hormel Foods or simply Hormel, is an American multinational food processing company founded in 1891 in Austin, Minnesota, by George A. Hormel as George A. Hormel & Company. The company originally focused on the packaging and selling of ham, sausage and other pork, chicken, beef and lamb products to consumers, adding Spam in 1937. By the 1980s, Hormel began offering a wider range of packaged and refrigerated foods.

Waste management or waste disposal includes the processes and actions required to manage waste from its inception to its final disposal. This includes the collection, transport, treatment, and disposal of waste, together with monitoring and regulation of the waste management process and waste-related laws, technologies, and economic mechanisms.

HRL vs WM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
WM
WM
2.0× larger
WM
$6.2B
$3.2B
HRL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
WM
WM
+2.0% gap
WM
3.5%
1.5%
HRL
Higher net margin
WM
WM
13.4% more per $
WM
11.6%
-1.8%
HRL
More free cash flow
WM
WM
$749.6M more FCF
WM
$981.0M
$231.4M
HRL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
WM
WM
Annualised
WM
7.4%
3.1%
HRL

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Revenue
$3.2B
$6.2B
Net Profit
$-56.1M
$723.0M
Gross Margin
14.0%
Operating Margin
0.1%
17.9%
Net Margin
-1.8%
11.6%
Revenue YoY
1.5%
3.5%
Net Profit YoY
-125.5%
13.5%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.10
$1.79

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Q1 26
$6.2B
Q4 25
$3.2B
$6.3B
Q3 25
$3.0B
$6.4B
Q2 25
$2.9B
$6.4B
Q1 25
$3.0B
$6.0B
Q4 24
$3.1B
$5.9B
Q3 24
$2.9B
$5.6B
Q2 24
$2.9B
$5.4B
Net Profit
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Q1 26
$723.0M
Q4 25
$-56.1M
$742.0M
Q3 25
$183.7M
$603.0M
Q2 25
$180.0M
$726.0M
Q1 25
$170.6M
$637.0M
Q4 24
$220.2M
$598.0M
Q3 24
$176.7M
$760.0M
Q2 24
$189.3M
$680.0M
Gross Margin
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Q1 26
Q4 25
14.0%
41.5%
Q3 25
16.1%
40.5%
Q2 25
16.7%
40.3%
Q1 25
15.9%
39.4%
Q4 24
16.6%
39.7%
Q3 24
16.8%
39.4%
Q2 24
17.4%
39.1%
Operating Margin
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Q1 26
17.9%
Q4 25
0.1%
18.3%
Q3 25
7.9%
15.3%
Q2 25
8.6%
17.9%
Q1 25
7.6%
16.8%
Q4 24
9.4%
15.6%
Q3 24
8.2%
20.0%
Q2 24
8.7%
18.7%
Net Margin
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Q1 26
11.6%
Q4 25
-1.8%
11.8%
Q3 25
6.1%
9.4%
Q2 25
6.2%
11.3%
Q1 25
5.7%
10.6%
Q4 24
7.0%
10.1%
Q3 24
6.1%
13.5%
Q2 24
6.6%
12.6%
EPS (diluted)
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Q1 26
$1.79
Q4 25
$-0.10
$1.83
Q3 25
$0.33
$1.49
Q2 25
$0.33
$1.80
Q1 25
$0.31
$1.58
Q4 24
$0.41
$1.49
Q3 24
$0.32
$1.88
Q2 24
$0.34
$1.69

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$703.6M
$158.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.9B
$22.9B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$7.9B
$10.0B
Total Assets
$13.4B
$45.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.36×
2.28×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Q1 26
$158.0M
Q4 25
$703.6M
$201.0M
Q3 25
$630.7M
$175.0M
Q2 25
$699.0M
$440.0M
Q1 25
$866.4M
$216.0M
Q4 24
$766.6M
$414.0M
Q3 24
$561.9M
$614.0M
Q2 24
$1.5B
$172.0M
Total Debt
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Q1 26
$22.9B
Q4 25
$2.9B
$22.2B
Q3 25
$2.9B
$22.5B
Q2 25
$2.9B
$23.1B
Q1 25
$2.9B
$22.9B
Q4 24
$2.9B
$22.5B
Q3 24
$2.9B
$16.0B
Q2 24
$2.9B
$16.5B
Stockholders' Equity
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Q1 26
$10.0B
Q4 25
$7.9B
$10.0B
Q3 25
$8.1B
$9.5B
Q2 25
$8.0B
$9.2B
Q1 25
$8.0B
$8.7B
Q4 24
$8.0B
$8.3B
Q3 24
$7.9B
$8.0B
Q2 24
$7.9B
$7.5B
Total Assets
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Q1 26
$45.7B
Q4 25
$13.4B
$45.8B
Q3 25
$13.5B
$45.6B
Q2 25
$13.4B
$45.7B
Q1 25
$13.4B
$44.5B
Q4 24
$13.4B
$44.6B
Q3 24
$13.1B
$34.7B
Q2 24
$14.1B
$34.0B
Debt / Equity
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Q1 26
2.28×
Q4 25
0.36×
2.22×
Q3 25
0.35×
2.36×
Q2 25
0.35×
2.51×
Q1 25
0.36×
2.65×
Q4 24
0.36×
2.73×
Q3 24
0.36×
2.00×
Q2 24
0.36×
2.21×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$322.9M
$1.5B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$231.4M
$981.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
7.3%
15.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.08×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$534.3M
$3.4B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Q1 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$322.9M
$1.7B
Q3 25
$156.7M
$1.6B
Q2 25
$56.4M
$1.5B
Q1 25
$309.2M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$408.6M
$1.5B
Q3 24
$218.0M
$1.4B
Q2 24
$236.1M
$1.2B
Free Cash Flow
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Q1 26
$981.0M
Q4 25
$231.4M
$810.0M
Q3 25
$84.5M
$816.0M
Q2 25
$-18.6M
$813.0M
Q1 25
$237.0M
$377.0M
Q4 24
$324.8M
$396.0M
Q3 24
$152.5M
$577.0M
Q2 24
$176.2M
$487.0M
FCF Margin
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Q1 26
15.8%
Q4 25
7.3%
12.8%
Q3 25
2.8%
12.7%
Q2 25
-0.6%
12.6%
Q1 25
7.9%
6.3%
Q4 24
10.4%
6.7%
Q3 24
5.3%
10.3%
Q2 24
6.1%
9.0%
Capex Intensity
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.9%
14.1%
Q3 25
2.4%
12.0%
Q2 25
2.6%
11.4%
Q1 25
2.4%
13.8%
Q4 24
2.7%
18.9%
Q3 24
2.3%
13.9%
Q2 24
2.1%
12.3%
Cash Conversion
HRL
HRL
WM
WM
Q1 26
2.08×
Q4 25
2.29×
Q3 25
0.85×
2.64×
Q2 25
0.31×
2.13×
Q1 25
1.81×
1.90×
Q4 24
1.86×
2.53×
Q3 24
1.23×
1.79×
Q2 24
1.25×
1.70×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

HRL
HRL

Retail Segment$1.9B60%
Foodservice Segment$1.1B34%
Other$174.7M5%

WM
WM

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons