vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hilltop Holdings Inc. (HTH) and Netskope Inc (NTSK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hilltop Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($300.5M vs $184.2M, roughly 1.6× Netskope Inc). Hilltop Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 13.0% vs -246.0%, a 259.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Hilltop Holdings Inc. is a financial holding company based in Dallas, Texas. It offers financial products and banking services through three primary subsidiaries: PlainsCapital Bank, PrimeLending, and HilltopSecurities.
Netskope Inc is a leading global cybersecurity firm offering SASE solutions, cloud security platforms and zero trust tools. It serves enterprise clients across North America, Europe and Asia Pacific, helping secure remote workforces, cloud apps and digital assets against evolving cyber threats.
HTH vs NTSK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $300.5M | $184.2M |
| Net Profit | $39.0M | $-453.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -242.7% |
| Net Margin | 13.0% | -246.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -12.4% | -401.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.64 | $-1.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $300.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $329.9M | $184.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $330.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $303.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $301.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $297.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $39.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.6M | $-453.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 57.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.1% | -242.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | -246.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.64 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.68 | $-1.85 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.74 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.57 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.65 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.31 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $990.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $151.0M |
| Total Assets | $15.7B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.46× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $990.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $151.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $15.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $19.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $10.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-38.7M | $19.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $273.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-234.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $273.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $515.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-435.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-55.5M | $10.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $271.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-234.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $266.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $513.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-437.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -16.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 168.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -147.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.93× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.71× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.41× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HTH
| Noninterest Income | $188.4M | 63% |
| Net Interest Income | $112.1M | 37% |
NTSK
| Indirect Channels | $175.2M | 95% |
| Direct End Customers | $8.9M | 5% |
