vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HEARTLAND EXPRESS INC (HTLD) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PicoCELA Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.6M vs $179.4M, roughly 1.4× HEARTLAND EXPRESS INC). HEARTLAND EXPRESS INC runs the higher net margin — -10.8% vs -125.2%, a 114.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. HEARTLAND EXPRESS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-44.2M vs $-256.6M).
Heartland Express is an American trucking company headquartered in North Liberty, Iowa. The company offers truckload shipping services across the United States.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
HTLD vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $179.4M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $-19.4M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -12.7% | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | -10.8% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -26.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -949.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.24 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $179.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $210.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $219.4M | $252.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $242.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $259.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $270.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-19.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.9M | $-316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -12.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.8% | -114.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.3% | -125.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.24 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.19 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $18.5M | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $154.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $755.3M | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.20× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.9M | $456.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $154.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $187.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $755.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $775.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $786.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $807.7M | $354.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $822.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $825.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $836.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $848.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.9M | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-44.2M | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -24.6% | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 33.0% | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-66.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $14.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $-245.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-44.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-256.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-45.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -24.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | -101.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 33.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HTLD
Segment breakdown not available.
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
