vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of H2O AMERICA (HTO) and MARCUS CORP (MCS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

H2O AMERICA is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($199.4M vs $193.5M, roughly 1.0× MARCUS CORP). On growth, MARCUS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.8% vs 1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, MARCUS CORP's revenue compounded faster (18.2% CAGR vs 15.3%).

H2O Wireless is a United States-based prepaid cell phone service, that utilizes the AT&T network. It is a brand of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Locus Telecommunications, a subsidiary of Telrite Holdings, Inc., since 2019. Locus was formerly a subsidiary of KDDI America corporation, starting in 2010. H2O Wireless is primarily advertised as a non-restrictive phone service for customers to bring or buy unlocked smartphones, although AT&T contract/locked phones may be accepted as well.

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. is an American company that provides real estate brokerage, mortgage brokerage, research, and advisory services in the U.S. and Canada in the field of commercial property. It popularized the practice of listing properties exclusively with one brokerage firm. The company has over 1,800 employees in more than 80 offices across the U.S. and Canada.

HTO vs MCS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
HTO
HTO
1.0× larger
HTO
$199.4M
$193.5M
MCS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MCS
MCS
+1.3% gap
MCS
2.8%
1.5%
HTO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
MCS
MCS
Annualised
MCS
18.2%
15.3%
HTO

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Revenue
$199.4M
$193.5M
Net Profit
$16.2M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
16.6%
0.9%
Net Margin
8.1%
Revenue YoY
1.5%
2.8%
Net Profit YoY
-29.2%
EPS (diluted)
$0.45

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$199.4M
$193.5M
Q3 25
$243.5M
$210.2M
Q2 25
$197.8M
$206.0M
Q1 25
$164.9M
$148.8M
Q4 24
$196.5M
$188.3M
Q3 24
$216.7M
$232.7M
Q2 24
$173.1M
$176.0M
Q1 24
$150.0M
$138.5M
Net Profit
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$16.2M
Q3 25
$45.1M
$16.2M
Q2 25
$24.7M
$7.3M
Q1 25
$16.6M
$-16.8M
Q4 24
$22.9M
$986.0K
Q3 24
$38.7M
$23.3M
Q2 24
$20.7M
$-20.2M
Q1 24
$11.7M
$-11.9M
Operating Margin
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
16.6%
0.9%
Q3 25
26.5%
10.8%
Q2 25
22.2%
6.3%
Q1 25
21.8%
-13.7%
Q4 24
22.2%
-1.2%
Q3 24
26.9%
14.1%
Q2 24
23.4%
1.3%
Q1 24
18.6%
-12.0%
Net Margin
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
8.1%
Q3 25
18.5%
7.7%
Q2 25
12.5%
3.6%
Q1 25
10.0%
-11.3%
Q4 24
11.7%
0.5%
Q3 24
17.8%
10.0%
Q2 24
12.0%
-11.5%
Q1 24
7.8%
-8.6%
EPS (diluted)
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$0.45
Q3 25
$1.27
Q2 25
$0.71
Q1 25
$0.49
Q4 24
$0.70
Q3 24
$1.17
Q2 24
$0.64
Q1 24
$0.36

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$20.7M
$23.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.9B
$159.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.5B
$457.4M
Total Assets
$5.1B
$1.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.23×
0.35×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$20.7M
$23.4M
Q3 25
$11.3M
$7.4M
Q2 25
$19.8M
$14.9M
Q1 25
$23.7M
$11.9M
Q4 24
$11.1M
$40.8M
Q3 24
$4.0M
$28.4M
Q2 24
$22.8M
$32.8M
Q1 24
$4.5M
$17.3M
Total Debt
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$1.9B
$159.0M
Q3 25
$162.0M
Q2 25
$179.9M
Q1 25
$198.9M
Q4 24
$1.7B
$159.1M
Q3 24
$173.1M
Q2 24
$175.7M
Q1 24
$169.8M
Stockholders' Equity
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$1.5B
$457.4M
Q3 25
$1.5B
$454.3M
Q2 25
$1.5B
$448.4M
Q1 25
$1.4B
$441.8M
Q4 24
$1.4B
$464.9M
Q3 24
$1.3B
$462.3M
Q2 24
$1.3B
$449.4M
Q1 24
$1.2B
$459.3M
Total Assets
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$5.1B
$1.0B
Q3 25
$5.0B
$1.0B
Q2 25
$4.8B
$1.0B
Q1 25
$4.7B
$1.0B
Q4 24
$4.7B
$1.0B
Q3 24
$4.6B
$1.0B
Q2 24
$4.4B
$1.1B
Q1 24
$4.4B
$1.0B
Debt / Equity
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
1.23×
0.35×
Q3 25
0.36×
Q2 25
0.40×
Q1 25
0.45×
Q4 24
1.26×
0.34×
Q3 24
0.37×
Q2 24
0.39×
Q1 24
0.37×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$63.5M
$48.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$26.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
13.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
11.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.92×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$989.0K

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$63.5M
$48.8M
Q3 25
$77.3M
$39.1M
Q2 25
$60.8M
$31.6M
Q1 25
$43.2M
$-35.3M
Q4 24
$41.5M
$52.6M
Q3 24
$53.5M
$30.5M
Q2 24
$49.3M
$36.0M
Q1 24
$51.2M
$-15.1M
Free Cash Flow
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
$26.4M
Q3 25
$18.2M
Q2 25
$14.7M
Q1 25
$-58.3M
Q4 24
$27.1M
Q3 24
$12.0M
Q2 24
$16.1M
Q1 24
$-30.5M
FCF Margin
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
13.6%
Q3 25
8.7%
Q2 25
7.1%
Q1 25
-39.2%
Q4 24
14.4%
Q3 24
5.2%
Q2 24
9.2%
Q1 24
-22.0%
Capex Intensity
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
11.6%
Q3 25
9.9%
Q2 25
8.2%
Q1 25
15.5%
Q4 24
13.5%
Q3 24
7.9%
Q2 24
11.3%
Q1 24
11.1%
Cash Conversion
HTO
HTO
MCS
MCS
Q4 25
3.92×
Q3 25
1.71×
2.41×
Q2 25
2.47×
4.32×
Q1 25
2.61×
Q4 24
1.81×
53.31×
Q3 24
1.39×
1.31×
Q2 24
2.38×
Q1 24
4.38×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

HTO
HTO

Water Utility Services$191.0M96%
Other$8.4M4%

MCS
MCS

Theatres$123.1M64%
Concessions$51.0M26%
Food And Beverage$21.2M11%

Related Comparisons