vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of H2O AMERICA (HTO) and Enpro Inc. (NPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Enpro Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($295.4M vs $199.4M, roughly 1.5× H2O AMERICA). H2O AMERICA runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs -10.8%, a 19.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Enpro Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs 1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, H2O AMERICA's revenue compounded faster (15.3% CAGR vs 7.1%).
H2O Wireless is a United States-based prepaid cell phone service, that utilizes the AT&T network. It is a brand of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Locus Telecommunications, a subsidiary of Telrite Holdings, Inc., since 2019. Locus was formerly a subsidiary of KDDI America corporation, starting in 2010. H2O Wireless is primarily advertised as a non-restrictive phone service for customers to bring or buy unlocked smartphones, although AT&T contract/locked phones may be accepted as well.
Enpro is a US-based industrial technology company that designs and manufactures products and materials for technology-intensive sectors. The company serves industries such as semiconductors, aerospace, power generation, heavy-duty trucking, agricultural machinery, chemical processing, pulp and paper, and life sciences from 61 primary manufacturing facilities located in 12 countries, worldwide. It is organized under three segments: Sealing Technologies, Advanced Surface Technologies, and Engin...
HTO vs NPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.4M | $295.4M |
| Net Profit | $16.2M | $-32.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 42.1% |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | 11.2% |
| Net Margin | 8.1% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.5% | 14.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.2% | -330.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.45 | $-1.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $199.4M | $295.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $243.5M | $286.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $197.8M | $288.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.9M | $273.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.5M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.7M | $260.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.1M | $271.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.0M | $257.5M |
| Q4 25 | $16.2M | $-32.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.1M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $26.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6M | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.7M | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.7M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $12.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 41.2% |
| Q4 25 | 16.6% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.2% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 17.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.6% | 10.9% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.5% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.8% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.45 | $-1.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.27 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | $1.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $1.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.17 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.64 | $1.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.7M | $114.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | $655.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.23× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.7M | $114.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | $132.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8M | $107.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7M | $240.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | $236.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $206.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.8M | $175.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $163.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $655.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $640.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $644.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | 1.23× | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | 0.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.92× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.3M | $65.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.8M | $52.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.2M | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.5M | $59.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.5M | $54.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.3M | $43.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.2M | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $53.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $42.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $48.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.92× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.71× | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.47× | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.61× | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | 4.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.39× | 2.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.38× | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.38× | 0.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HTO
| Water Utility Services | $191.0M | 96% |
| Other | $8.4M | 4% |
NPO
| Sealing Technologies Segment | $187.0M | 63% |
| General Industrial | $71.3M | 24% |
| Power Generation | $19.9M | 7% |
| Oiland Gas Market | $15.0M | 5% |
| Semiconductors | $2.2M | 1% |
