vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of H2O AMERICA (HTO) and Shutterstock, Inc. (SSTK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Shutterstock, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($220.2M vs $199.4M, roughly 1.1× H2O AMERICA). H2O AMERICA runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs -7.3%, a 15.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, H2O AMERICA posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.5% vs -12.0%). Over the past eight quarters, H2O AMERICA's revenue compounded faster (15.3% CAGR vs 1.4%).
H2O Wireless is a United States-based prepaid cell phone service, that utilizes the AT&T network. It is a brand of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Locus Telecommunications, a subsidiary of Telrite Holdings, Inc., since 2019. Locus was formerly a subsidiary of KDDI America corporation, starting in 2010. H2O Wireless is primarily advertised as a non-restrictive phone service for customers to bring or buy unlocked smartphones, although AT&T contract/locked phones may be accepted as well.
Shutterstock, Inc. is an American provider of stock photography, stock footage, stock music, and editing tools; it is headquartered in New York. Founded in 2002 by programmer and photographer Jon Oringer, Shutterstock maintains a library of around 200 million royalty-free stock photos, vector graphics, and illustrations, with around 10 million video clips and music tracks available for licensing. Originally a subscription site only, Shutterstock expanded beyond subscriptions into à la carte p...
HTO vs SSTK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.4M | $220.2M |
| Net Profit | $16.2M | $-16.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | -1.1% |
| Net Margin | 8.1% | -7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.5% | -12.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.2% | -1021.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.45 | $-0.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $199.4M | $220.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $243.5M | $260.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $197.8M | $267.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.9M | $242.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.5M | $250.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.7M | $250.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.1M | $220.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.0M | $214.3M |
| Q4 25 | $16.2M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.1M | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $29.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6M | $18.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.7M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.7M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $16.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 58.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 58.8% |
| Q4 25 | 16.6% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.2% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.6% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | -7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.8% | 7.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.45 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.27 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | $0.82 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.17 | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.64 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $0.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.7M | $178.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $581.0M |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.23× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.7M | $178.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | $165.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8M | $116.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7M | $112.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | $111.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $131.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.8M | $74.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $71.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $581.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $594.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $586.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $547.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $518.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $522.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $520.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $541.3M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 1.23× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.5M | $36.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $25.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 11.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.92× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $123.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.5M | $36.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.3M | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.8M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.2M | $25.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.5M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.5M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.3M | $28.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.2M | $8.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $25.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $68.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-952.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-26.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-6.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.92× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.71× | 5.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.47× | 0.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.61× | 1.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.39× | -0.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.38× | 7.71× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.38× | 0.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HTO
| Water Utility Services | $191.0M | 96% |
| Other | $8.4M | 4% |
SSTK
Segment breakdown not available.
