vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of H2O AMERICA (HTO) and SYNAPTICS Inc (SYNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SYNAPTICS Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($302.5M vs $199.4M, roughly 1.5× H2O AMERICA). H2O AMERICA runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs -4.9%, a 13.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SYNAPTICS Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs 1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, H2O AMERICA's revenue compounded faster (15.3% CAGR vs 12.9%).
H2O Wireless is a United States-based prepaid cell phone service, that utilizes the AT&T network. It is a brand of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Locus Telecommunications, a subsidiary of Telrite Holdings, Inc., since 2019. Locus was formerly a subsidiary of KDDI America corporation, starting in 2010. H2O Wireless is primarily advertised as a non-restrictive phone service for customers to bring or buy unlocked smartphones, although AT&T contract/locked phones may be accepted as well.
Synaptics, Inc. is an American neural network technologies and computer-to-human interface devices development company based in San Jose, California. It develops touchpads and fingerprint biometrics technology for computer laptops; touch, display driver, and fingerprint biometrics technology for smartphones; and touch, video and far-field voice, low-power AI processors, and wireless technology for smart home devices, wearables, and automobiles. Synaptics sells its products to original equipme...
HTO vs SYNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.4M | $302.5M |
| Net Profit | $16.2M | $-14.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.5% |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | -5.0% |
| Net Margin | 8.1% | -4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.5% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.2% | -922.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.45 | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $199.4M | $302.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $243.5M | $292.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $197.8M | $282.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.9M | $266.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.5M | $267.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.7M | $257.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.1M | $247.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.0M | $237.3M |
| Q4 25 | $16.2M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.1M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6M | $-21.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.7M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.7M | $208.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $-18.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 46.5% |
| Q4 25 | 16.6% | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.2% | -8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | -9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | -5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | -12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.6% | -7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.5% | -7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | -9.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | 84.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.8% | -7.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.45 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.27 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.17 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.64 | $5.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.36 | $-0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.7M | $437.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | $836.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.23× | 0.60× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.7M | $437.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | $459.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8M | $452.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7M | $421.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | $596.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $853.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.8M | $876.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $828.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $836.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $835.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $834.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $834.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $832.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $983.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | 1.23× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.5M | $29.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $18.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.92× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $154.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.5M | $29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.3M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.8M | $57.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.2M | $73.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.5M | $22.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.5M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.3M | $65.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.2M | $-13.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $50.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $68.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-20.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $57.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-22.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -9.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.92× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | 12.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.38× | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.38× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HTO
| Water Utility Services | $191.0M | 96% |
| Other | $8.4M | 4% |
SYNA
| Enterprise And Automotive Product Applications | $161.1M | 53% |
| Internet Of Things Product Applications | $93.2M | 31% |
| Mobile Product Applications | $48.2M | 16% |
