vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of H2O AMERICA (HTO) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($331.0M vs $199.4M, roughly 1.7× H2O AMERICA). H2O AMERICA runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs 7.1%, a 1.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERFACE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, H2O AMERICA's revenue compounded faster (15.3% CAGR vs -2.3%).
H2O Wireless is a United States-based prepaid cell phone service, that utilizes the AT&T network. It is a brand of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Locus Telecommunications, a subsidiary of Telrite Holdings, Inc., since 2019. Locus was formerly a subsidiary of KDDI America corporation, starting in 2010. H2O Wireless is primarily advertised as a non-restrictive phone service for customers to bring or buy unlocked smartphones, although AT&T contract/locked phones may be accepted as well.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
HTO vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.4M | $331.0M |
| Net Profit | $16.2M | $23.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | 9.8% |
| Net Margin | 8.1% | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.5% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.2% | 81.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.45 | $0.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $199.4M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $243.5M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $197.8M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.9M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.5M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.7M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.1M | $346.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.2M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.1M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.9M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.7M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.7M | $22.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.6% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.45 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.27 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.17 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.64 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $20.7M | $61.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | $196.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $634.6M |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.23× | 0.31× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $61.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.7M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.8M | $94.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $387.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $634.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $451.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.23× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.92× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.5M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.3M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.8M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.2M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.5M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.5M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.3M | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.92× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.71× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.47× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.61× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.81× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.39× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.38× | 0.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HTO
| Water Utility Services | $191.0M | 96% |
| Other | $8.4M | 4% |
TILE
| AMS | $195.7M | 59% |
| EAAA | $135.4M | 41% |
