vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) and Mohawk Industries (MHK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mohawk Industries is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.8× Hubbell Incorporated). Hubbell Incorporated runs the higher net margin — 14.6% vs 4.3%, a 10.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hubbell Incorporated posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs 8.0%). Hubbell Incorporated produced more free cash flow last quarter ($388.8M vs $7.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Hubbell Incorporated's revenue compounded faster (3.3% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Hubbell Incorporated, headquartered in Shelton, Connecticut, is an American company that designs, manufactures, and sells electrical and electronic products for non-residential and residential construction, industrial, and utility applications. Hubbell was founded by Harvey Hubbell as a proprietorship in 1888, and was incorporated in Connecticut in 1905.
Mohawk Industries is an American flooring manufacturer based in Calhoun, Georgia. Mohawk produces floor covering products for residential and commercial applications in North America and residential applications in Europe. The company manufacturing portfolio consists of soft flooring products, hard flooring products, laminate flooring, sheet vinyl and luxury vinyl tile, natural stone and quartz countertops. In Europe, the company also produces and sells insulation, panels and mezzanine flooring.
HUBB vs MHK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $2.7B |
| Net Profit | $217.7M | $117.1M |
| Gross Margin | 34.6% | 23.5% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 4.1% |
| Net Margin | 14.6% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.9% | 8.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.5% | 61.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.06 | $1.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $117.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $217.7M | $42.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.5M | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $244.2M | $146.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.7M | $72.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.0M | $93.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $219.4M | $162.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.6M | $157.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.6% | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.2% | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.1% | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.8% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.5% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.0% | 25.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.7% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.90 | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.06 | $0.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.77 | $1.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.56 | $2.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.15 | $1.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.65 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.05 | $2.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.94 | $2.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $497.9M | $872.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | $8.4B |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | $13.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $872.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $497.9M | $856.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $680.9M | $516.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $399.6M | $546.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $360.3M | $702.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $345.0M | $666.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.6M | $424.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $406.5M | $497.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $7.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $13.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $13.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $13.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9B | $13.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | $12.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9B | $13.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.44× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.63× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $447.5M | $110.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $388.8M | $7.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.0% | 0.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.06× | 0.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $874.7M | $709.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $110.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $447.5M | $459.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $284.3M | $386.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.6M | $206.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.4M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $432.4M | $397.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.0M | $319.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $239.6M | $233.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $388.8M | $265.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.8M | $310.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.7M | $126.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $-85.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $364.4M | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.8M | $204.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.7M | $142.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | -3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.3% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.2% | 5.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.94× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.06× | 10.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | 3.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.07× | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.19× | 4.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.12× | 1.48× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HUBB
| Grid Infrastructure | $717.0M | 48% |
| Industrial | $393.7M | 26% |
| Grid Automation | $218.9M | 15% |
| Electrical Products | $163.1M | 11% |
MHK
| Global Ceramic | $1.1B | 40% |
| Flooring NA | $880.0M | 32% |
| Flooring ROW | $751.3M | 28% |
