vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.7× Hubbell Incorporated). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 14.6%, a 7.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 11.9%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $388.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 3.3%).
Hubbell Incorporated, headquartered in Shelton, Connecticut, is an American company that designs, manufactures, and sells electrical and electronic products for non-residential and residential construction, industrial, and utility applications. Hubbell was founded by Harvey Hubbell as a proprietorship in 1888, and was incorporated in Connecticut in 1905.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
HUBB vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $217.7M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | 34.6% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 14.6% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.9% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.5% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.06 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $217.7M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.5M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $244.2M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.7M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.0M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $219.4M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.6M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.8M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | 34.6% | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.2% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.1% | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.8% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.5% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.0% | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.0% | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | 20.3% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.7% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.5% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.3% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $4.06 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.77 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.56 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.15 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.65 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.05 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.94 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.73 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $497.9M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $497.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $680.9M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $399.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $360.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $345.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.6M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $406.5M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $400.3M | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.39× | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.44× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.51× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.63× | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.65× | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $447.5M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $388.8M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.0% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.06× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $874.7M | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $447.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $284.3M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.6M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.4M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $432.4M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.0M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $239.6M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.2M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | $388.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.8M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.7M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $364.4M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.8M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.7M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.9M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | 26.0% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.3% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.2% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.06× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.19× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.12× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.62× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HUBB
| Grid Infrastructure | $717.0M | 48% |
| Industrial | $393.7M | 26% |
| Grid Automation | $218.9M | 15% |
| Electrical Products | $163.1M | 11% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
