vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) and MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp (VAC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hubbell Incorporated is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.2× MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp). Hubbell Incorporated runs the higher net margin — 14.6% vs -35.0%, a 49.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hubbell Incorporated posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs -0.7%). Hubbell Incorporated produced more free cash flow last quarter ($388.8M vs $-6.0M). Over the past eight quarters, MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs 3.3%).
Hubbell Incorporated, headquartered in Shelton, Connecticut, is an American company that designs, manufactures, and sells electrical and electronic products for non-residential and residential construction, industrial, and utility applications. Hubbell was founded by Harvey Hubbell as a proprietorship in 1888, and was incorporated in Connecticut in 1905.
Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation is a pure-play public timeshare company. Formerly a division of Marriott International, Marriott Vacations Worldwide was established as a separate, publicly traded entity focusing primarily on vacation ownership in November 2011. Marriott Vacations Worldwide runs more than 120 resorts with over 700,000 Owners and members in a diverse portfolio of brands under The Marriott Vacation Clubs name. Its brands include Marriott Vacation Club, The Marriott Vaca...
HUBB vs VAC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $217.7M | $-431.0M |
| Gross Margin | 34.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 14.6% | -35.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.9% | -0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.5% | -962.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.06 | $-12.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $217.7M | $-431.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $244.2M | $69.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.7M | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.0M | $50.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $219.4M | $84.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.6M | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.8M | $47.0M |
| Q4 25 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | -35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $4.06 | $-12.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.77 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.56 | $1.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.15 | $1.46 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.65 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.05 | $2.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.94 | $0.98 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.73 | $1.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $497.9M | $406.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.8B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $8.2B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $497.9M | $406.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $680.9M | $474.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $399.6M | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $360.3M | $196.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $345.0M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.6M | $197.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $406.5M | $206.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $400.3M | $237.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9B | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9B | $9.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $9.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.65× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $447.5M | $6.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $388.8M | $-6.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.0% | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.06× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $874.7M | $-29.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $447.5M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $284.3M | $62.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.6M | $-48.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.4M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $432.4M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.0M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $239.6M | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.2M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $388.8M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.8M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.7M | $-68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $364.4M | $86.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.8M | $58.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $205.7M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.9M | $-13.0M |
| Q4 25 | 26.0% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | -0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.07× | -0.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | 0.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.19× | 2.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.03× | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.12× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.62× | 0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HUBB
| Grid Infrastructure | $717.0M | 48% |
| Industrial | $393.7M | 26% |
| Grid Automation | $218.9M | 15% |
| Electrical Products | $163.1M | 11% |
VAC
| Cost Reimbursement | $467.0M | 38% |
| Time Share | $381.0M | 31% |
| Management And Exchange | $212.0M | 17% |
| Ancillary Revenues | $64.0M | 5% |
| Management Service | $55.0M | 4% |
| Service Other | $36.0M | 3% |