vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hub Cyber Security Ltd. (HUBC) and LANTRONIX INC (LTRX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LANTRONIX INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($29.8M vs $13.9M, roughly 2.1× Hub Cyber Security Ltd.). LANTRONIX INC runs the higher net margin — -4.5% vs -91.4%, a 87.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
The Hub Power Company Limited, colloquially known as HUBCO, is a Pakistani power company based in Karachi, Sindh. It was the first independent power producer (IPP) established in Pakistan, and before the termination of its energy agreement in October 2024, it was the largest IPP in the country. HUBCO is listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange.
LANTRONIX INCLTRXEarnings & Financial Report
Lantronix Inc is a global provider of secure IoT connectivity and edge computing solutions. It offers specialized hardware, SaaS platforms and embedded software for industrial, healthcare, retail, transportation and smart city clients worldwide, supporting reliable remote device management.
HUBC vs LTRX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.9M | $29.8M |
| Net Profit | $-12.7M | $-1.3M |
| Gross Margin | 25.6% | 43.6% |
| Operating Margin | -80.8% | -3.6% |
| Net Margin | -91.4% | -4.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 43.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $28.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9M | $31.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7M | $49.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $41.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.7M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.4M | $386.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-423.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.6% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 38.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -12.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -80.8% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -95.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -91.4% | -7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -167.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.1M | $23.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-80.8M | $74.4M |
| Total Assets | $27.4M | $121.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $24.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $74.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $74.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $75.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-80.8M | $77.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $78.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-59.4M | $81.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $78.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $121.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $123.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $124.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.4M | $134.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $137.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $136.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $147.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-6.3M | $2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $9.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.3M | $340.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.8M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $909.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $256.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.89× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HUBC
Segment breakdown not available.
LTRX
| Embedded Io T Solutions | $13.9M | 47% |
| Io T System Solutions | $13.3M | 45% |
| Software And Services | $2.6M | 9% |
