vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of HUBSPOT INC (HUBS) and Veralto (VLTO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Veralto is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $881.0M, roughly 1.6× HUBSPOT INC). Veralto runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 3.7%, a 13.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HUBSPOT INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.4% vs 4.4%). Over the past eight quarters, HUBSPOT INC's revenue compounded faster (17.6% CAGR vs 5.8%).

HubSpot, Inc. is a US-based developer and marketer of software products for marketing, sales, and customer service. HubSpot was founded by Brian Halligan and Dharmesh Shah in 2006. The global headquarters is in Cambridge, MA.

Veralto Corporation is an American technology company headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts. It produces products related to water analytics, water treatment, marking and coding, and packaging and color.

HUBS vs VLTO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
VLTO
VLTO
1.6× larger
VLTO
$1.4B
$881.0M
HUBS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
HUBS
HUBS
+19.0% gap
HUBS
23.4%
4.4%
VLTO
Higher net margin
VLTO
VLTO
13.3% more per $
VLTO
17.0%
3.7%
HUBS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
HUBS
HUBS
Annualised
HUBS
17.6%
5.8%
VLTO

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Revenue
$881.0M
$1.4B
Net Profit
$32.6M
$239.0M
Gross Margin
83.5%
60.1%
Operating Margin
19.7%
23.2%
Net Margin
3.7%
17.0%
Revenue YoY
23.4%
4.4%
Net Profit YoY
5.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.62
$0.95

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
$881.0M
Q4 25
$846.7M
$1.4B
Q3 25
$809.5M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$760.9M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$714.1M
Q4 24
$703.2M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$669.7M
$1.3B
Q2 24
$637.2M
$1.3B
Net Profit
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
$32.6M
Q4 25
$54.4M
$239.0M
Q3 25
$16.5M
$222.0M
Q2 25
$-3.3M
$225.0M
Q1 25
$-21.8M
Q4 24
$5.0M
$227.0M
Q3 24
$8.1M
$219.0M
Q2 24
$-14.4M
$203.0M
Gross Margin
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
83.5%
Q4 25
83.7%
60.1%
Q3 25
83.5%
60.0%
Q2 25
83.9%
60.4%
Q1 25
83.9%
Q4 24
85.3%
59.6%
Q3 24
85.2%
59.6%
Q2 24
85.0%
60.1%
Operating Margin
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
19.7%
Q4 25
5.7%
23.2%
Q3 25
1.4%
22.8%
Q2 25
-3.2%
24.2%
Q1 25
-3.8%
Q4 24
-1.5%
22.9%
Q3 24
-1.4%
23.4%
Q2 24
-3.8%
23.2%
Net Margin
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
3.7%
Q4 25
6.4%
17.0%
Q3 25
2.0%
16.2%
Q2 25
-0.4%
16.9%
Q1 25
-3.1%
Q4 24
0.7%
16.9%
Q3 24
1.2%
16.7%
Q2 24
-2.3%
15.8%
EPS (diluted)
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
$0.62
Q4 25
$1.03
$0.95
Q3 25
$0.31
$0.89
Q2 25
$-0.06
$0.90
Q1 25
$-0.42
Q4 24
$0.09
$0.91
Q3 24
$0.16
$0.88
Q2 24
$-0.28
$0.81

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.7B
$1.8B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.8B
Total Assets
$3.8B
$7.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.94×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
$1.7B
Q4 25
$882.2M
$1.8B
Q3 25
$614.4M
$1.6B
Q2 25
$601.2M
$1.2B
Q1 25
$625.0M
Q4 24
$512.7M
$1.1B
Q3 24
$410.1M
$1.3B
Q2 24
$797.9M
$1.0B
Total Debt
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
Q4 25
$2.7B
Q3 25
$2.7B
Q2 25
$2.6B
Q1 25
Q4 24
$2.6B
Q3 24
$2.6B
Q2 24
$2.6B
Stockholders' Equity
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
Q4 25
$2.1B
$2.8B
Q3 25
$1.9B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$2.1B
$2.3B
Q1 25
$2.0B
Q4 24
$1.9B
$2.0B
Q3 24
$1.8B
$2.0B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$1.7B
Total Assets
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
$3.8B
Q4 25
$3.9B
$7.4B
Q3 25
$3.5B
$7.2B
Q2 25
$3.7B
$6.6B
Q1 25
$3.9B
Q4 24
$3.8B
$6.4B
Q3 24
$3.6B
$6.3B
Q2 24
$3.4B
$5.9B
Debt / Equity
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.94×
Q3 25
1.01×
Q2 25
1.14×
Q1 25
Q4 24
1.28×
Q3 24
1.35×
Q2 24
1.57×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$270.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$258.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
18.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.13×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$986.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
Q4 25
$247.4M
$270.0M
Q3 25
$187.4M
$339.0M
Q2 25
$164.4M
$157.0M
Q1 25
$161.6M
Q4 24
$194.1M
$285.0M
Q3 24
$159.5M
$224.0M
Q2 24
$117.8M
$251.0M
Free Cash Flow
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
Q4 25
$234.0M
$258.0M
Q3 25
$177.0M
$323.0M
Q2 25
$148.3M
$142.0M
Q1 25
$148.2M
Q4 24
$181.4M
$263.0M
Q3 24
$148.4M
$215.0M
Q2 24
$109.6M
$240.0M
FCF Margin
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
Q4 25
27.6%
18.4%
Q3 25
21.9%
23.6%
Q2 25
19.5%
10.7%
Q1 25
20.8%
Q4 24
25.8%
19.6%
Q3 24
22.2%
16.4%
Q2 24
17.2%
18.6%
Capex Intensity
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.6%
0.9%
Q3 25
1.3%
1.2%
Q2 25
2.1%
1.1%
Q1 25
1.9%
Q4 24
1.8%
1.6%
Q3 24
1.7%
0.7%
Q2 24
1.3%
0.9%
Cash Conversion
HUBS
HUBS
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.55×
1.13×
Q3 25
11.33×
1.53×
Q2 25
0.70×
Q1 25
Q4 24
38.96×
1.26×
Q3 24
19.59×
1.02×
Q2 24
1.24×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

HUBS
HUBS

Subscription$862.3M98%
Other$18.7M2%

VLTO
VLTO

Product Quality And Innovation Segment$548.0M39%
Revenuefrom Contractwith Customer Measurement Recurring$521.0M37%
Revenuefrom Contractwith Customer Measurement Nonrecurring$335.0M24%

Related Comparisons