vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) and Nayax Ltd. (NYAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hut 8 Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($88.5M vs $78.1M, roughly 1.1× Nayax Ltd.). Nayax Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -3.9% vs -316.0%, a 312.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hut 8 Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (179.2% vs 39.0%).
Tropical Hut is a Filipino chain of fast food restaurants owned by Mercury Group of Companies, Inc. It is the 7th oldest food chain in the Philippines and older than Jollibee (1978) and McDonald's Philippines (1981).
Nayax Ltd. is a global fintech company that offers cashless, telemetry, management, monitoring, and business intelligence (BI) products and services for the vending, unattended, and other retail industries.
HUT vs NYAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $88.5M | $78.1M |
| Net Profit | $-279.7M | $-3.0M |
| Gross Margin | 60.4% | 44.3% |
| Operating Margin | -491.4% | 1.2% |
| Net Margin | -316.0% | -3.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 179.2% | 39.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -283.7% | 24.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.45 | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $88.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.2M | $78.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-279.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-133.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $647.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-71.9M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $250.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 60.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.4% | 44.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -491.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -676.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -246.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -316.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 332.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -613.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 480.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -204.1% | -3.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 484.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.45 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.18 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.30 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.41 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.78 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.76 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $44.9M | $61.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $158.7M |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $434.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $44.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $108.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $61.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $300.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $297.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $328.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $177.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $960.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $976.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $703.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $660.1M | $158.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $732.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $434.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $999.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.24× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-139.2M | $9.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-139.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $770.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-48.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-68.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.4M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-26.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.36× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.45× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.11× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HUT
| High Performance Computing Colocation And Cloud | $81.9M | 93% |
| Power | $5.0M | 6% |
| Digital Infrastructure | $1.6M | 2% |
NYAX
Segment breakdown not available.
