vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) and TWIN DISC INC (TWIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

TWIN DISC INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($90.2M vs $88.5M, roughly 1.0× Hut 8 Corp.). TWIN DISC INC runs the higher net margin — 24.8% vs -316.0%, a 340.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hut 8 Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (179.2% vs 0.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Hut 8 Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (30.8% CAGR vs 10.3%).

Tropical Hut is a Filipino chain of fast food restaurants owned by Mercury Group of Companies, Inc. It is the 7th oldest food chain in the Philippines and older than Jollibee (1978) and McDonald's Philippines (1981).

Twin Disc, Inc. designs, manufactures, and distributes power transmission equipment for a wide range of applications, including marine, off-road vehicle, and industrial. The company was founded in 1918 to manufacture clutches for farm tractors. It is now a worldwide company with subsidiaries or sales offices in Asia, Europe, North America, Oceania, and South America.

HUT vs TWIN — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TWIN
TWIN
1.0× larger
TWIN
$90.2M
$88.5M
HUT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
HUT
HUT
+178.9% gap
HUT
179.2%
0.3%
TWIN
Higher net margin
TWIN
TWIN
340.9% more per $
TWIN
24.8%
-316.0%
HUT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
HUT
HUT
Annualised
HUT
30.8%
10.3%
TWIN

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Revenue
$88.5M
$90.2M
Net Profit
$-279.7M
$22.4M
Gross Margin
60.4%
24.8%
Operating Margin
-491.4%
2.3%
Net Margin
-316.0%
24.8%
Revenue YoY
179.2%
0.3%
Net Profit YoY
-283.7%
2334.3%
EPS (diluted)
$-2.45
$1.55

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$88.5M
$90.2M
Q3 25
$83.5M
$80.0M
Q2 25
$41.3M
$96.7M
Q1 25
$21.8M
$81.2M
Q4 24
$31.7M
$89.9M
Q3 24
$43.7M
$72.9M
Q2 24
$35.2M
$84.4M
Q1 24
$51.7M
$74.2M
Net Profit
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$-279.7M
$22.4M
Q3 25
$50.1M
$-518.0K
Q2 25
$137.3M
$1.4M
Q1 25
$-133.9M
$-1.5M
Q4 24
$152.2M
$919.0K
Q3 24
$647.0K
$-2.8M
Q2 24
$-71.9M
$7.4M
Q1 24
$250.9M
$3.8M
Gross Margin
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
60.4%
24.8%
Q3 25
61.3%
28.7%
Q2 25
47.3%
31.0%
Q1 25
14.5%
26.7%
Q4 24
35.9%
24.1%
Q3 24
59.9%
26.5%
Q2 24
41.4%
29.7%
Q1 24
45.6%
28.2%
Operating Margin
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
-491.4%
2.3%
Q3 25
87.0%
2.8%
Q2 25
5.5%
Q1 25
-676.8%
2.4%
Q4 24
3.1%
Q3 24
-3.6%
-0.2%
Q2 24
-246.2%
5.6%
Q1 24
4.9%
Net Margin
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
-316.0%
24.8%
Q3 25
60.0%
-0.6%
Q2 25
332.5%
1.5%
Q1 25
-613.7%
-1.8%
Q4 24
480.3%
1.0%
Q3 24
1.5%
-3.8%
Q2 24
-204.1%
8.8%
Q1 24
484.9%
5.2%
EPS (diluted)
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$-2.45
$1.55
Q3 25
$0.43
$-0.04
Q2 25
$1.18
$0.10
Q1 25
$-1.30
$-0.11
Q4 24
$1.41
$0.07
Q3 24
$0.01
$-0.20
Q2 24
$-0.78
$0.54
Q1 24
$2.76
$0.27

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$44.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$44.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.4B
$184.5M
Total Assets
$2.8B
$384.0M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.24×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$44.9M
Q3 25
$33.5M
Q2 25
$216.3M
Q1 25
$108.4M
Q4 24
$85.0M
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
$11.5M
Total Debt
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$44.5M
Q3 25
$43.7M
Q2 25
$31.4M
Q1 25
$40.8M
Q4 24
$300.6M
$24.9M
Q3 24
$297.3M
$29.8M
Q2 24
$328.8M
$25.8M
Q1 24
$177.6M
$17.0M
Stockholders' Equity
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$1.4B
$184.5M
Q3 25
$1.4B
$160.3M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$164.0M
Q1 25
$960.0M
$149.5M
Q4 24
$976.7M
$147.0M
Q3 24
$703.9M
$157.5M
Q2 24
$660.1M
$154.7M
Q1 24
$732.0M
$146.3M
Total Assets
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$2.8B
$384.0M
Q3 25
$2.7B
$363.5M
Q2 25
$2.0B
$355.6M
Q1 25
$1.6B
$332.9M
Q4 24
$1.5B
$307.4M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$323.5M
Q2 24
$1.1B
$312.1M
Q1 24
$999.0M
$288.8M
Debt / Equity
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
0.24×
Q3 25
0.27×
Q2 25
0.19×
Q1 25
0.27×
Q4 24
0.31×
0.17×
Q3 24
0.42×
0.19×
Q2 24
0.50×
0.17×
Q1 24
0.24×
0.12×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-139.2M
$4.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
1.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.20×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-70.0K

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$-139.2M
$4.6M
Q3 25
$770.0K
$-7.5M
Q2 25
$-48.8M
$16.4M
Q1 25
$-33.8M
$3.2M
Q4 24
$-68.5M
$8.7M
Q3 24
$-4.2M
$-4.3M
Q2 24
$-16.4M
$11.4M
Q1 24
$-26.3M
$6.2M
Free Cash Flow
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
$1.2M
Q3 25
$-11.0M
Q2 25
$8.7M
Q1 25
$906.0K
Q4 24
$5.9M
Q3 24
$-6.7M
Q2 24
$10.3M
Q1 24
$4.0M
FCF Margin
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
1.4%
Q3 25
-13.7%
Q2 25
9.0%
Q1 25
1.1%
Q4 24
6.5%
Q3 24
-9.2%
Q2 24
12.2%
Q1 24
5.5%
Capex Intensity
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
3.7%
Q3 25
4.3%
Q2 25
8.0%
Q1 25
2.8%
Q4 24
3.1%
Q3 24
3.2%
Q2 24
1.3%
Q1 24
2.9%
Cash Conversion
HUT
HUT
TWIN
TWIN
Q4 25
0.20×
Q3 25
0.02×
Q2 25
-0.36×
11.55×
Q1 25
Q4 24
-0.45×
9.42×
Q3 24
-6.49×
Q2 24
1.54×
Q1 24
-0.11×
1.63×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

HUT
HUT

High Performance Computing Colocation And Cloud$81.9M93%
Power$5.0M6%
Digital Infrastructure$1.6M2%

TWIN
TWIN

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons