vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES INC (HVT) and UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ (OLED). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($201.9M vs $142.2M, roughly 1.4× UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\). UNIVERSAL DISPLAY CORP \PA\ runs the higher net margin — 25.2% vs 4.2%, a 21.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.5% vs -14.5%). Over the past eight quarters, HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES INC's revenue compounded faster (4.8% CAGR vs -5.3%).
Furniture Brands International, Inc. was a home furnishings company, headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. The company began in 1911 as International Shoe Company with the merger of Roberts, Johnson & Rand Shoe Company and Peters Shoe Company. In 1966, the company changed its name to Interco as the result of diversification, and once the company exited the shoe business, adopted the name Furniture Brands International. Some of the brands it owned in the furniture industry included Broyhill, Tho...
Universal Display Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials, and it is a provider of services to the display and lighting industries.
HVT vs OLED — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $201.9M | $142.2M |
| Net Profit | $8.5M | $35.9M |
| Gross Margin | 60.4% | 74.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 30.1% |
| Net Margin | 4.2% | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.5% | -14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4.1% | -44.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $142.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $201.9M | $172.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $194.5M | $139.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $181.0M | $171.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $181.6M | $166.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.4M | $162.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.9M | $161.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.6M | $158.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.5M | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $67.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $66.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $52.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 74.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 60.4% | 76.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.3% | 74.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.8% | 77.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.2% | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.9% | 77.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.2% | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.4% | 75.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 38.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 33.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $125.3M | $516.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $307.9M | — |
| Total Assets | $649.1M | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $516.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $125.3M | $602.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.5M | $603.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.4M | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.9M | $571.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $120.0M | $492.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.2M | $551.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.9M | $530.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $307.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $306.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $304.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $305.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $307.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $307.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $307.1M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $649.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $651.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $642.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $642.7M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $648.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $659.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.1M | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $7.4M | $108.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.86× | 3.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $33.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $108.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.4M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.9M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.9M | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4M | $79.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.4M | $67.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.3M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $37.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.0K | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1M | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.1M | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9M | $57.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 60.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.2% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.86× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.75× | 2.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.69× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.06× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.96× | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.25× | 1.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HVT
| Upholstery | $91.0M | 45% |
| Bedroom Furniture | $29.2M | 14% |
| Accessories And Other | $28.4M | 14% |
| Dining Room Furniture | $22.8M | 11% |
| Mattresses | $16.1M | 8% |
| Occasional | $14.4M | 7% |
OLED
| Material sales | $83.7M | 59% |
| Royalty and license fees | $54.2M | 38% |
| Contract research services | $4.3M | 3% |
