vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES INC (HVT) and ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (ORA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($276.0M vs $201.9M, roughly 1.4× HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES INC). ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 11.4% vs 4.2%, a 7.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.6% vs 9.5%). HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.0M vs $-40.0M). Over the past eight quarters, ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (11.0% CAGR vs 4.8%).
Furniture Brands International, Inc. was a home furnishings company, headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. The company began in 1911 as International Shoe Company with the merger of Roberts, Johnson & Rand Shoe Company and Peters Shoe Company. In 1966, the company changed its name to Interco as the result of diversification, and once the company exited the shoe business, adopted the name Furniture Brands International. Some of the brands it owned in the furniture industry included Broyhill, Tho...
Ormat Technologies, Inc. is an international company based in Reno, Nevada, United States. Ormat supplies alternative and renewable geothermal energy technology. The company has built over 190 power plants and installed over 3,200 MW of output. As of January 2021 it owns and operates 933 MW of geothermal and recovered energy based power plants. Ormat has supplied over 1000 turbochargers worldwide, in North America, South America, Europe, Australia, and Asia. The company's products also includ...
HVT vs ORA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $201.9M | $276.0M |
| Net Profit | $8.5M | $31.4M |
| Gross Margin | 60.4% | 28.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 15.4% |
| Net Margin | 4.2% | 11.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.5% | 19.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4.1% | -23.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.51 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $201.9M | $276.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $194.5M | $249.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $181.0M | $234.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $181.6M | $229.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.4M | $230.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.9M | $211.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.6M | $213.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $184.0M | $224.2M |
| Q4 25 | $8.5M | $31.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $24.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $28.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $40.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | $40.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $38.6M |
| Q4 25 | 60.4% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.3% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.8% | 24.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.2% | 31.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.9% | 31.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.2% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.4% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 60.3% | 35.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 23.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 17.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.51 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.66 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.67 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.64 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $125.3M | $147.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $307.9M | $2.5B |
| Total Assets | $649.1M | $6.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $125.3M | $147.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.5M | $79.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.4M | $88.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.9M | $112.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $120.0M | $94.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.2M | $88.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.9M | $66.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $111.8M | $201.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $307.9M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $306.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $304.9M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $305.4M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $307.6M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $307.8M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $307.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $306.7M | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $649.1M | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $651.7M | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $642.7M | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $642.7M | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $648.7M | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $659.3M | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.1M | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $640.5M | $5.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $7.4M | $105.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.0M | $-40.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.5% | -14.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | 52.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.86× | 3.35× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $33.0M | $-284.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.4M | $105.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.9M | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $96.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | $88.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.9M | $158.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4M | $106.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.4M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $115.2M |
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $-40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.3M | $-102.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $-37.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.0K | $-104.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1M | $30.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.1M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9M | $-116.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.3M | $11.8M |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | -14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | -40.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | -16.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | -45.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.2% | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | -54.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.8% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 52.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 59.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 83.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 51.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 69.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 46.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.86× | 3.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.75× | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.69× | 3.45× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.06× | 3.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.96× | 4.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.25× | 1.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.31× | 2.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HVT
| Upholstery | $91.0M | 45% |
| Bedroom Furniture | $29.2M | 14% |
| Accessories And Other | $28.4M | 14% |
| Dining Room Furniture | $22.8M | 11% |
| Mattresses | $16.1M | 8% |
| Occasional | $14.4M | 7% |
ORA
| Electricity | $186.6M | 68% |
| Products | $63.1M | 23% |
| Energy Storage Segment | $26.3M | 10% |
| Product Segment | $1.2M | 0% |
