vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES INC (HVT) and Gentherm Inc (THRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gentherm Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($382.8M vs $201.9M, roughly 1.9× HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES INC). HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES INC runs the higher net margin — 4.2% vs 0.8%, a 3.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.5% vs 8.5%). Gentherm Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($6.7M vs $3.0M). Over the past eight quarters, HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES INC's revenue compounded faster (4.8% CAGR vs 3.7%).
Furniture Brands International, Inc. was a home furnishings company, headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. The company began in 1911 as International Shoe Company with the merger of Roberts, Johnson & Rand Shoe Company and Peters Shoe Company. In 1966, the company changed its name to Interco as the result of diversification, and once the company exited the shoe business, adopted the name Furniture Brands International. Some of the brands it owned in the furniture industry included Broyhill, Tho...
Gentherm Incorporated, formerly Amerigon, is an American thermal management technologies company. Gentherm created the first thermoelectrically heated and cooled seat system for the automotive industry. Called the "Climate Control Seat" system, it was first adopted by the Ford Motor Company and introduced as an option on the model year 2000 Lincoln Navigator in 1999. Today it is available on more than 50 vehicles sold by Ford, General Motors, Toyota (Lexus), Kia, Hyundai, Nissan (Infiniti), R...
HVT vs THRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $201.9M | $382.8M |
| Net Profit | $8.5M | $3.0M |
| Gross Margin | 60.4% | 23.7% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 4.6% |
| Net Margin | 4.2% | 0.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.5% | 8.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4.1% | -80.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $201.9M | $382.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $194.5M | $386.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $181.0M | $375.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $181.6M | $353.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.4M | $352.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.9M | $371.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.6M | $375.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $184.0M | $356.0M |
| Q4 25 | $8.5M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $477.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $-128.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2M | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | $14.8M |
| Q4 25 | 60.4% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.3% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.8% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.2% | 24.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.9% | 24.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.2% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.4% | 25.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 60.3% | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | -0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.51 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $125.3M | $160.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $189.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $307.9M | $720.3M |
| Total Assets | $649.1M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.26× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $125.3M | $160.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.5M | $154.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.4M | $128.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.9M | $163.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $120.0M | $134.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.2M | $150.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.9M | $123.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $111.8M | $125.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $189.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $189.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $209.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $262.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $220.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $222.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $222.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $222.2M |
| Q4 25 | $307.9M | $720.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $306.0M | $717.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $304.9M | $699.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $305.4M | $646.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $307.6M | $616.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $307.8M | $660.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $307.1M | $640.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $306.7M | $647.1M |
| Q4 25 | $649.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $651.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $642.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $642.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $648.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $659.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $640.5M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $7.4M | $29.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.0M | $6.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.5% | 1.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | 5.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.86× | 9.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $33.0M | $61.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.4M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.9M | $56.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.9M | $36.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.4M | $46.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.4M | $37.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $-10.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.3M | $46.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $36.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.0K | $-28.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1M | $13.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.1M | $26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.3M | $-21.6M |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.8% | -6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.86× | 9.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.75× | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.69× | 94.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.06× | 2.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.96× | 2.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.25× | 1.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.31× | -0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HVT
| Upholstery | $91.0M | 45% |
| Bedroom Furniture | $29.2M | 14% |
| Accessories And Other | $28.4M | 14% |
| Dining Room Furniture | $22.8M | 11% |
| Mattresses | $16.1M | 8% |
| Occasional | $14.4M | 7% |
THRM
| Climate Control Seats | $200.9M | 52% |
| Lumbar And Massage Comfort Solutions | $58.5M | 15% |
| Climate Control Interiors | $50.3M | 13% |
| Other Automotive | $27.6M | 7% |
| Valve Systems | $24.1M | 6% |
| Medical Segments | $13.9M | 4% |
| Climate And Comfort Electronics | $7.4M | 2% |
