vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HANCOCK WHITNEY CORP (HWC) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HANCOCK WHITNEY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($295.0M vs $252.6M, roughly 1.2× PicoCELA Inc.). HANCOCK WHITNEY CORP runs the higher net margin — 16.1% vs -125.2%, a 141.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Hancock Whitney Corp. is an American bank holding company headquartered in Gulfport, Mississippi. It operates 237 branches in Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Texas. The bank is the official bank of the New Orleans Saints and issues the official debit card. The bank is also the official bank of LSU Athletics and the Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns, being the exclusive provider of credit cards for the LSU Tigers, as well as debit cards for both athletic brands.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
HWC vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $295.0M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $47.4M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | 16.1% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -19.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -60.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.57 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $295.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $389.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $385.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $375.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $364.7M | $252.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $364.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $367.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $359.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | $47.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $127.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.9% | -114.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -125.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.57 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.48 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.32 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.38 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.40 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.33 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.31 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $223.7M | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $35.5B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $223.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $456.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $199.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $210.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $210.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $236.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $236.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $354.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $35.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $35.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $541.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $158.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $125.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.2M | $-245.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $625.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $105.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $523.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.2M | $-256.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $615.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 134.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.5% | -101.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 168.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HWC
Segment breakdown not available.
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
