vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of HAWKINS INC (HWKN) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($625.1M vs $244.1M, roughly 2.6× HAWKINS INC). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs 5.9%, a 7.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 7.9%). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($140.3M vs $21.2M). Over the past eight quarters, HAWKINS INC's revenue compounded faster (8.2% CAGR vs 4.6%).
Hawkins Cookers Limited Inc and formerly known as Pressure Cookers and Appliances Ltd, is an Indian company which manufactures pressure cookers and cookware. The company is based in Mumbai and has three manufacturing plants at Thane, Hoshiarpur and Jaunpur. It manufactures under brand names of Hawkins, Futura, Contura, Hevibase, Big Boy, Miss Mary and Ventura. Hawkins is one of the largest pressure cooker manufacturers in India and exports its products to more than 65 countries.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
HWKN vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $244.1M | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $14.3M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | 20.8% | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | 9.2% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.9% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.7% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.69 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $244.1M | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $280.4M | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $293.3M | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $245.3M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $226.2M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $247.0M | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $255.9M | $597.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $570.9M |
| Q4 25 | $14.3M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.2M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.3M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.0M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.1M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $72.6M |
| Q4 25 | 20.8% | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.1% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.7% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.4% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.4% | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.3% | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 46.9% |
| Q4 25 | 9.2% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.1% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.1% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.3% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.6% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.9% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.9% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.7% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.69 | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.08 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.40 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.77 | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.72 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.16 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.38 | $2.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $264.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $518.9M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $976.5M | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.51× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1M | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $279.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $237.1M |
| Q4 25 | $264.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $299.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $149.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $134.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $518.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $507.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $484.6M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $460.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $457.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $443.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $421.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $976.5M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $984.2M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $988.3M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $769.9M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $707.2M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $689.7M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $702.7M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $35.6M | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $21.2M | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.7% | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.9% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.48× | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $87.7M | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $35.6M | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.5M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.8M | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.0M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.6M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.6M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $45.6M |
| Q4 25 | $21.2M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.7M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.9M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.8M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.3M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.0M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $35.5M |
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.5% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.48× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.75× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.08× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.89× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.61× | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
HWKN
| Manufactured Blended Or Repackaged Products | $107.0M | 44% |
| Industrial Solutions | $53.6M | 22% |
| Food | $29.2M | 12% |
| Nutrition | $24.6M | 10% |
| Bulk Products | $12.0M | 5% |
| Water Surplus Inc. | $8.4M | 3% |
| Pharmaceutical | $7.3M | 3% |
| Other | $1.5M | 1% |
WTS
Segment breakdown not available.
