vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of i-80 Gold Corp. (IAUX) and Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
i-80 Gold Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.3M vs $14.6M, roughly 1.5× Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs -401.9%, a 466.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.2M vs $-39.2M).
i-80 Gold Corp is a mineral exploration and development firm focused on gold and silver asset operations in Nevada, US. It advances high-potential mining projects, using responsible extraction practices to deliver precious metals to global industrial and investment markets.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
IAUX vs IDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.3M | $14.6M |
| Net Profit | $-85.6M | $9.4M |
| Gross Margin | 22.0% | 68.5% |
| Operating Margin | -291.6% | 62.4% |
| Net Margin | -401.9% | 64.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 92.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 220.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $21.3M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.5M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-85.6M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-41.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.2M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-41.2M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-43.1M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-41.0M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | 22.0% | 68.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 63.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 57.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -42.7% | 48.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -171.4% | 50.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | -291.6% | 62.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -86.7% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -67.4% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -112.3% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -210.0% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -435.2% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.3% |
| Q4 25 | -401.9% | 64.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -130.8% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -108.5% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -293.3% | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -374.5% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -570.8% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.11 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $174.7M | $2.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $346.8M | $108.2M |
| Total Assets | $703.4M | $116.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.50× | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.8M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | $174.7M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $175.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $175.8M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.5M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | $346.8M | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $423.0M | $74.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $463.5M | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $39.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.9M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.2M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $21.6M |
| Q4 25 | $703.4M | $116.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $756.2M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $782.9M | $57.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $659.0M | $48.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $32.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $28.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.50× | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.42× | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.38× | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.62× | 0.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-34.3M | $10.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-39.2M | $8.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -184.3% | 56.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 23.1% | 17.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-93.2M | $12.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-34.3M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.3M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.5M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.6M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-39.2M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.5M | $709.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.4M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.1M | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.8M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | -184.3% | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -57.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -44.7% | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -164.1% | 13.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -206.7% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -349.1% | 38.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | 23.1% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
IAUX
| Granite Creek Mining Company | $20.3M | 95% |
| Ruby Hill Mining Company LLC | $991.0K | 5% |
| Lone Tree Minning Company | $3.0K | 0% |
IDR
Segment breakdown not available.