vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ImmunityBio, Inc. (IBRX) and KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ImmunityBio, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($38.3M vs $25.8M, roughly 1.5× KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.). KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. runs the higher net margin — -101.7% vs -161.8%, a 60.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ImmunityBio, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (407.0% vs -26.6%).
ImmunityBio, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing next-generation immunotherapies and vaccine candidates targeting multiple cancer types and infectious diseases. It operates mainly in the U.S. market, with core R&D segments including cell therapy, antibody therapeutics, and targeted vaccine platforms designed to enhance patient treatment outcomes.
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. is a specialized real estate finance firm sponsored by global investment firm KKR. It primarily originates, acquires, and manages a portfolio of senior secured commercial real estate loans, mostly backed by high-quality institutional commercial properties across the United States, delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors via interest income from its diversified assets.
IBRX vs KREF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $38.3M | $25.8M |
| Net Profit | $-61.9M | $-26.2M |
| Gross Margin | 99.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -169.0% | -105.1% |
| Net Margin | -161.8% | -101.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 407.0% | -26.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.7% | -229.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-0.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $38.3M | $25.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.1M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.4M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $31.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6M | $35.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $39.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-61.9M | $-26.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-67.3M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-92.6M | $-29.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-129.6M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.2M | $20.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-85.7M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.1M |
| Q4 25 | 99.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 99.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 99.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 99.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -169.0% | -105.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -173.5% | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -269.8% | -101.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -390.1% | -18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -919.0% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1314.3% | -19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 63.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | -161.8% | -101.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -209.8% | 54.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -350.3% | -98.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -784.9% | -15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -783.4% | 57.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1404.0% | -20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 63.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -7.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.08 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $242.8M | $84.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-500.5M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $501.9M | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $242.8M | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $257.8M | $204.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.7M | $107.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.6M | $106.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.8M | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.4M | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $107.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $106.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-500.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-524.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-570.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-591.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-489.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-745.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $501.9M | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $519.0M | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $402.1M | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $303.8M | $6.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $382.9M | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $364.6M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-70.4M | $72.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-71.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -186.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-308.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-70.4M | $72.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-68.9M | $18.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-79.7M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-85.9M | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-85.1M | $132.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-98.8M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $34.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-71.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-69.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-80.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-87.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-87.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-101.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -186.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -217.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -305.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -526.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1155.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1663.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
