vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ICHOR HOLDINGS, LTD. (ICHR) and Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

ICHOR HOLDINGS, LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($256.1M vs $151.7M, roughly 1.7× Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.). ICHOR HOLDINGS, LTD. runs the higher net margin — -1.0% vs -5.5%, a 4.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (128.4% vs 4.7%). Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($13.0M vs $-10.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (134.4% CAGR vs 12.3%).

Ichor Holdings Ltd. designs, manufactures and supplies critical fluid delivery systems, subsystems and related components for the global semiconductor manufacturing sector. Its products are integrated into front-end wafer processing equipment, supporting production of advanced logic, memory and specialty chips for leading semiconductor device and equipment makers across North America, East Asia and Europe.

Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a late-stage clinical biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing innovative therapeutic candidates for unmet medical needs in ophthalmology, dermatology, and other specialty care areas. It operates primarily in the United States, with lead product candidates targeting common, underdiagnosed conditions including demodex blepharitis and rosacea.

ICHR vs TARS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ICHR
ICHR
1.7× larger
ICHR
$256.1M
$151.7M
TARS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TARS
TARS
+123.6% gap
TARS
128.4%
4.7%
ICHR
Higher net margin
ICHR
ICHR
4.6% more per $
ICHR
-1.0%
-5.5%
TARS
More free cash flow
TARS
TARS
$23.0M more FCF
TARS
$13.0M
$-10.0M
ICHR
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TARS
TARS
Annualised
TARS
134.4%
12.3%
ICHR

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Revenue
$256.1M
$151.7M
Net Profit
$-2.5M
$-8.4M
Gross Margin
12.6%
Operating Margin
88.2%
-5.3%
Net Margin
-1.0%
-5.5%
Revenue YoY
4.7%
128.4%
Net Profit YoY
45.8%
63.8%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.07
$-0.17

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$256.1M
Q4 25
$223.6M
$151.7M
Q3 25
$239.3M
$118.7M
Q2 25
$240.3M
$102.7M
Q1 25
$244.5M
$78.3M
Q4 24
$233.3M
$66.4M
Q3 24
$211.1M
$48.1M
Q2 24
$203.2M
$40.8M
Net Profit
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$-2.5M
Q4 25
$-16.0M
$-8.4M
Q3 25
$-22.9M
$-12.6M
Q2 25
$-9.4M
$-20.3M
Q1 25
$-4.6M
$-25.1M
Q4 24
$-3.9M
$-23.1M
Q3 24
$-2.8M
$-23.4M
Q2 24
$-5.1M
$-33.3M
Gross Margin
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
12.6%
Q4 25
9.4%
Q3 25
4.6%
Q2 25
11.3%
Q1 25
11.7%
Q4 24
11.6%
Q3 24
13.2%
Q2 24
12.6%
Operating Margin
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
88.2%
Q4 25
-6.2%
-5.3%
Q3 25
-8.1%
-12.2%
Q2 25
-2.0%
-21.6%
Q1 25
-0.5%
-33.5%
Q4 24
-0.5%
-36.8%
Q3 24
-0.2%
-52.3%
Q2 24
-1.1%
-81.6%
Net Margin
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
-1.0%
Q4 25
-7.1%
-5.5%
Q3 25
-9.6%
-10.6%
Q2 25
-3.9%
-19.8%
Q1 25
-1.9%
-32.1%
Q4 24
-1.7%
-34.8%
Q3 24
-1.3%
-48.7%
Q2 24
-2.5%
-81.6%
EPS (diluted)
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$-0.07
Q4 25
$-0.46
$-0.17
Q3 25
$-0.67
$-0.30
Q2 25
$-0.28
$-0.48
Q1 25
$-0.13
$-0.64
Q4 24
$-0.11
$-0.57
Q3 24
$-0.08
$-0.61
Q2 24
$-0.15
$-0.88

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$89.1M
$417.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$6.3M
$72.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$668.0M
$343.4M
Total Assets
$972.5M
$562.2M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.01×
0.21×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$89.1M
Q4 25
$98.3M
$417.3M
Q3 25
$92.5M
$401.8M
Q2 25
$92.2M
$381.1M
Q1 25
$109.3M
$407.9M
Q4 24
$108.7M
$291.4M
Q3 24
$116.4M
$317.0M
Q2 24
$114.3M
$323.6M
Total Debt
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$6.3M
Q4 25
$123.5M
$72.4M
Q3 25
$123.5M
$72.3M
Q2 25
$125.0M
$72.1M
Q1 25
$126.8M
$72.0M
Q4 24
$128.5M
$71.8M
Q3 24
$130.3M
$71.7M
Q2 24
$130.2M
$71.6M
Stockholders' Equity
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$668.0M
Q4 25
$663.9M
$343.4M
Q3 25
$676.2M
$335.1M
Q2 25
$694.1M
$332.6M
Q1 25
$700.4M
$342.5M
Q4 24
$698.3M
$224.5M
Q3 24
$697.3M
$237.5M
Q2 24
$694.9M
$252.2M
Total Assets
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$972.5M
Q4 25
$942.9M
$562.2M
Q3 25
$966.6M
$534.6M
Q2 25
$985.1M
$495.0M
Q1 25
$1.0B
$500.8M
Q4 24
$995.6M
$377.0M
Q3 24
$975.9M
$376.3M
Q2 24
$947.7M
$376.8M
Debt / Equity
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
0.01×
Q4 25
0.19×
0.21×
Q3 25
0.18×
0.22×
Q2 25
0.18×
0.22×
Q1 25
0.18×
0.21×
Q4 24
0.18×
0.32×
Q3 24
0.19×
0.30×
Q2 24
0.19×
0.28×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$19.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-10.0M
$13.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-3.9%
8.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.8%
4.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-16.8M
$-22.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$9.2M
$19.3M
Q3 25
$9.2M
$18.3M
Q2 25
$-7.5M
$-29.4M
Q1 25
$19.0M
$-20.7M
Q4 24
$-2.5M
$-22.2M
Q3 24
$8.1M
$-8.7M
Q2 24
$17.5M
$-14.4M
Free Cash Flow
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
$-10.0M
Q4 25
$5.9M
$13.0M
Q3 25
$2.1M
$16.3M
Q2 25
$-14.8M
$-30.4M
Q1 25
$496.0K
$-21.2M
Q4 24
$-6.9M
$-22.3M
Q3 24
$2.2M
$-8.9M
Q2 24
$14.6M
$-15.4M
FCF Margin
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
-3.9%
Q4 25
2.6%
8.6%
Q3 25
0.9%
13.8%
Q2 25
-6.2%
-29.6%
Q1 25
0.2%
-27.1%
Q4 24
-3.0%
-33.5%
Q3 24
1.0%
-18.6%
Q2 24
7.2%
-37.8%
Capex Intensity
ICHR
ICHR
TARS
TARS
Q1 26
2.8%
Q4 25
1.5%
4.2%
Q3 25
3.0%
1.6%
Q2 25
3.0%
1.0%
Q1 25
7.6%
0.8%
Q4 24
1.9%
0.1%
Q3 24
2.8%
0.6%
Q2 24
1.4%
2.5%

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons