vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SeaStar Medical Holding Corp (ICU) and Modular Medical, Inc. (MODD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SeaStar Medical Holding Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($420.0K vs $108.0K, roughly 3.9× Modular Medical, Inc.). SeaStar Medical Holding Corp runs the higher net margin — -691.4% vs -4878.7%, a 4187.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Modular Medical, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18498.6% vs 526.9%).
ICU Medical, Inc. is a medical technology company based in San Clemente, California. ICU Medical products are designed to prevent bloodstream infections and protect healthcare workers from exposure to infectious diseases or hazardous drugs. ICU Medical product line includes intravenous therapy (IV) products, pumps, needle-free vascular access devices, custom infusion sets, closed system hazardous drug handling devices and systems, sensor catheters, needle-free closed blood sampling systems, a...
Varian Medical Systems is an American radiation oncology treatments and software maker based in Palo Alto, California. Their medical devices include linear accelerators (LINACs) and software for treating cancer and other medical conditions with radiotherapy, radiosurgery, proton therapy, and brachytherapy. The company supplies software for managing cancer clinics, radiotherapy centers, and medical oncology practices. Varian Medical Systems employs more than 7,100 people at manufacturing sites...
ICU vs MODD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $420.0K | $108.0K |
| Net Profit | $-2.9M | $-5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 97.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -718.6% | -4878.7% |
| Net Margin | -691.4% | -4878.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 526.9% | 18498.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 34.3% | -56.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $420.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $183.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $338.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0 | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 97.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 92.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 92.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 100.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 100.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 100.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -718.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1955.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -519.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1304.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -7114.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6552.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -691.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1897.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -592.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1287.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -6595.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6585.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.10 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.03 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.73 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.4M | $3.8M |
| Total Assets | $14.2M | $6.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $565.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.1M | $-4.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -4133.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 462.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.5M | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
