vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of T Stamp Inc (IDAI) and Indonesia Energy Corp Ltd (INDO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Indonesia Energy Corp Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4M vs $908.9K, roughly 1.6× T Stamp Inc). Indonesia Energy Corp Ltd runs the higher net margin — -195.5% vs -279.9%, a 84.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Indonesia Energy Corp Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.0% vs -39.3%).
T Stamp Inc, trading under ticker IDAI, develops AI-powered identity verification, trust scoring, and fraud prevention solutions. It serves clients across fintech, healthcare, and e-commerce segments, primarily operating in North America to help organizations securely authenticate user identities and mitigate fraud risks.
PT Kino Indonesia Tbk, formerly PT Kinocare Era Kosmetindo, or simply known as Kino, is an Indonesian multinational consumer goods company headquartered in Tangerang, Banten, founded in 1999 by Harry Sanusi. It specializes the manufacturing of its products in the wide range of personal care, hygiene, health care, confectionery, pastry, beverages, and pet care. As of 2022, the company is currently led by Sidharta Prawira Oetama as its president director while Sanusi act as its president commis...
IDAI vs INDO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $908.9K | $1.4M |
| Net Profit | $-2.5M | $-2.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -224.9% | -167.8% |
| Net Margin | -279.9% | -195.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -39.3% | 0.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 57.7% | -34.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.37 | $-0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $908.9K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $872.5K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $812.7K | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $545.5K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $511.1K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.4K | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $573.7K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -224.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -203.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -207.0% | -167.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -396.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -81.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -523.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -524.7% | -102.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -496.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -279.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -219.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -210.7% | -195.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -395.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -401.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -245.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -519.3% | -114.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -466.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.37 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.72 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.69 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.89 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.19 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.97 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.7M | $21.9M |
| Total Assets | $11.2M | $25.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $292.1K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $598.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.5K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $816.7K | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4M | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $750.4K | $13.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7M | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.0M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 215.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-700.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 215.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -459.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -258.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -289.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -182.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -475.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -320.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -376.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
